Category talk:Coats of arms to be classified

It might be worth creating subcategories since many of these arms are sorted by country but not what they depict or the other way around. /Lokal_Profil 10:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I do not agree with this proposition. Most of the images in this category are identified (the bearer is known), but are not put in the adequate categories. So the name Category:Unidentified coats of arms is not correct.
Moreover the reason given for renaming is unclear. Zigeuner (talk) 15:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agree. Added a comment to User talk:Multichill before I saw your comment here. AnonMoos (talk) 17:07, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Don't really care about if it's renamed or not. Just cleaning up the tree of files needing category attention. Now we have a single root (Category:Unidentified subjects) for these kind of files. Multichill (talk) 20:18, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
OK. Thanks! Zigeuner (talk) 22:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Coats of arms to be classified" page.