Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Katta-Zoo-Muenster.jpg
File:Katta-Zoo-Muenster.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2013 at 18:57:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)- Support --Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 23:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Oppose IMO flashy unnattural colors, therefore stronger than realistic contrast, though this is really good for composition.--Telemaque MySon (talk) 09:42, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- I am not sure, I could upload another version, but I think the coat and eyes are brought out well with my editing. The colors are that way. I look forward to the other comments. IMHO flash usage should not be condemned in general with animal photography. Photos at noon become much better with moderate flash than without. Flash correction was set to -1. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:20, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Neutral Really nice capture, I just was going to support, but... the focus seems somewhere on the fur, whereas it should have been on the head. --A.Savin 20:37, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Info According to EXIF focus was on the right eye. IMHO the left eye is slightly sharper with the result that the coat comes out well. For me sharpness on both eyes is still OK. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support Normally I don't like that flash is (that much) visible but in this image it just seems to support the result greatly. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:29, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Stas1995 (talk) 21:24, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:37, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
