Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leucippus fallax in Isla Margarita.jpg
File:Leucippus fallax in Isla Margarita.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2013 at 02:50:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info With the help of camouflage and with a little patience. All by -- The Photographer (talk) 02:50, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- The Photographer (talk) 02:50, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral-- At the moment, I think there is some noise issue in the background. --Telemaque MySon (talk) 09:45, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Noise even visible at 25% view. I think the composition is not good enough for FP (centred position, disturbing background). I am missing some contrast in the photo. --Tuxyso (talk) 12:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Done --The Photographer (talk) 14:51, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- I admire the effort (and time) which is required to take such photos, but your new version still does not work as FP for me (looks now more like a painting, details of the bird's coat disappeared). --Tuxyso (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Right now I have not the experience to understand clearly what you mean. I have compared over time RAW version and noise correction, however, my eye can not see what you mention. Hopefully I can understand, but right now I can say that I disagree. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 03:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Oppose—Denoising smudges, and normally I'm a fan of bokeh, but the blurry fractured background doesn't work for me.—Kelvinsong (talk) 20:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- This animal was stuck in a tree, is the rainy season and they always remain hidden within the tree during this period, due to the ease of finding food. There are things that can not be changed. It is a type of tree with leaves densely fractured (Prosopis juliflora), not just this case, throughout this time they graze inside. In other months, the bird can be photographed outside the tangle of branches, however, not be observed so fat and well fed. --The Photographer (talk) 03:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- For the difficulty I'm changing my vote to Neutral—it's a beautiful image at thumbnail size, however I just don't think it's featured picture quality with the noise/denoising artifacts—Kelvinsong (talk) 03:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 21:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Weak support A little low on "wow" factor, but still very good overall. Michael Barera (talk) 02:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice capture, nice bokeh, all said, still significant quality issues at 100% --Dey.sandip (talk) 07:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Spartan7W (talk) 16:44, 12 January 2013 (UTC)