Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olympus OM10 and 50mm Zuiko lens.jpg

File:Olympus OM10 and 50mm Zuiko lens.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2013 at 01:11:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Info created by Uberprutser - uploaded by Uberprutser - nominated by Uberprutser -- Uberprutser (talk) 01:11, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Neutral  Oppose Lighting unimaginatively direct. Not sure about the framing. The image has been crudely Photoshoped, presumably to remove scratches, which causes a blurred patch in several places, rather than the actual text of the object. Colin (talk) 08:32, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment That bad? And I thought the only thing wrong with it were the fingerprints on the lens mount :) It's certainly better that the picture of the Praktica camera I submitted last week. The blurred parts come from focus stacking errors. I still need to learn how to manually correct those. Some dust specs have been removed but you would not be able to see that. But I think I better revoke my nomination because I've noticed that once you get a bad first review, chances are very slim that the picture will get featured.
    • Ah so that's what is going on. The stacking is probably responsible for the lack of 3D that I put down to the lighting. I have probably been too harsh. It is a very clean subject and that's not easy to achieve. And it is a very sharp image. I think the stacking errors will make an FP hard. Did you stack with Photoshop or another program? I've used enfuse with success. If you can get some of the frames you took into a Photoshop layer and aligned, then you might be able to reveal it selectively and fix the stack errors. And the clone tool might help with the blurred bits on the flat surfaces. -- Colin (talk) 16:21, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support Tomer T (talk) 16:18, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support Great capture! Michael Barera (talk) 22:21, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose As before, poor BG.  B.p. 22:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment I think I fixed most of the focus stacking error. Let me know if you spot some obvious ones so I can fix them before making the final image. The image will need to e cropped a little to remove the blurred edges of the frame. --Uberprutser (talk) 10:35, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose I don't like the crop. --King of 18:22, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment It's not a crop. It was intentionally shot this way to show more details and hide perspective distortion. --Uberprutser (talk) 18:49, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose The crops are frustrating to me, there is an issue at the extreme left of the picture (see the lens along the border), and the white balance looks wrong to me (too pink).--Jebulon (talk) 11:53, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose Crop or not but it looks really bad in my oppinion. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Béria Lima msg 16:59, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]