Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bruegge Panorama1.jpg

Image:Bruegge Panorama1.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2013 at 00:25:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by User:Arcalino - uploaded by User:Arcalino - nominated by User:Arcalino -- Arcalino (talk) 00:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 00:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC) to few contributions for voting --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:15, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed removal of vote: "Everybody can vote for his/her own nominations.", see above. --Julian H. (talk/files) 22:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral nice but to dark imo.--ArildV (talk) 11:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Telemaque MySon (talk) 13:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Tilted (compare rooftops with their reflections, the connection line is not vertical). --Julian H. (talk/files) 15:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bhuck (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ausgeglichene Farben und durch den Superweitwinkel ein sehr atmospherisches Bild --Ekehnel (talk) 17:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad technical quality (sharpness, noise, partially overexposed, perspective distortion). The image is bad balanced and overall to dark with low details. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Wladyslaw.--Jebulon (talk) 23:26, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I'm not a big fan of the lighting, but overall I still think it is FP-worthy. Michael Barera (talk) 01:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per others. Too dark. Yann (talk) 11:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alborzagros (talk) 12:50, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Variante: File:Bruegge Panorama1 edit .jpg edit

Info worked a bit on the darkness and rotated it, thanks for your constructive criticism User:Arcalino
Neutral Nice image! Darkness correction is good - the original picture was too dark. Perspective and/or lens distortion is negligible. B.t.w.: not all the old houses and gables in Bruges are perfectly vertical! But sharpness is not good enough for FP IMO. -- MJJR (talk) 21:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a little bit soft in the middle, but it is a lovely scene. Colin (talk) 22:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Much better than the other one. I am hesitant about the perspective. Yann (talk) 06:12, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]