Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Humanitarian aid OCPA-2005-10-28-090517.jpg

Image:Humanitarian aid OCPA-2005-10-28-090517.jpg, featured edit

#1 #2

Info created by Air Force Tech. Sgt. Mike Buytas - uploaded by Rama - nominated by Rama --Rama 10:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rama 10:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose small and noisy --Simonizer 11:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - ditto to Simonizer - MPF 14:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The scene, the emotions and the composition makes it FP for me. --Malene Thyssen 06:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WarX 17:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC) I know it's low quality, but it's great![reply]
Oppose ack Simonizer --Digon3 17:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support a very impressive photo --AngMoKio 20:12, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support a little noisy and small, you are right, but very affective --Packa 20:16, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - ack Simonizer - Lycaon 12:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - not too small, not too noisy and probably the most powerful shot on the page mixpix 00:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - --Luc Viatour 12:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Med 13:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Leafnode 08:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC) Impressive image. Quality is not everything, and here it's not that bad.[reply]
Support - A meaningful composition and a beautiful light User:Vassil 20 March 2007
Support - I uploaded a higher resolution of it. --Pmsyyz 01:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => waiting for the result of the edit. Simonizer 06:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit #2: larger, noise reduced edit

Info I don't have any problems with the noise level of the original, but I added a larger, noise reduced version. ~ trialsanderrors 20:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support either. Iconic image, excellent composition and lighting. ~ trialsanderrors 00:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - staying with oppose, as I don't find the composition very attractive - MPF 16:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I like almost everything in this picture: composition, light and human expression. But the quality is too poor for FP. Alvesgaspar 20:41, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How about the higher resolution version I uploaded? --Pmsyyz 22:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info OK, since the staus quo would lead to the odd situation where the smaller image were promoted instead of the larger, I informed all prior commenters in addition to the prior opposers. ~ trialsanderrors 00:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 06:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Luc Viatour 06:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support give my support to both versions. For such a picture the technical quality is not the most important...though the quality here is in both versions acceptable. --AngMoKio 10:58, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support coherent with nominating and supporting the first one. Rama 12:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info Please, go with the original. I dislike noise reduction intensely and neither this nor the larger size adds anything at all to the image for me. Having said that, far & away the biggest reason to support this image is the subject matter, so I would support either version, but I urge wavering voters to go with version 1. mixpix 16:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support like AngMoKio - the overall impression, which includes also the technical quality, is important --Packa 16:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the same reasons as before. Vassil
Support In my opinion both versions are great. --Leafnode 10:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MichaelMaggs 16:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great picture, no doubt. But i have to agree with Alvesgaspar --Simonizer 06:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose joining the naysayers. Lycaon 07:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --che 19:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T 20:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Med 08:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support The large version of course. --Digon3 02:32, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Romary 12:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Susanlesch 00:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 15 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. --Simonizer 10:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]