User talk:SergeWoodzing/Archive 5

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Birgit Ridderstedt Xmas group 1957.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Birgit Ridderstedt Xmas group 1957.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 02:23, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Please be patient - I am working on this as fast as I can. That's why it says "pending". --SergeWoodzing (talk) 02:25, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Kelly Tainton 2017.jpg

File:Kelly Tainton 2017.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: COM:CSD#G8 Page dependent on nonexistent content. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Kolla RFA

Hej du hade en diskussion i november med Patrick Rogel. En liknande person vill bli Admin nu,se https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators#Requests_for_adminship om 1989. Jag tror inte detta blir någon bra admin, så jag röstar nog Nej. Men du kanske vill titta själv. Mvh --Janwikifoto (talk) 23:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Hrn ,den användaren sitter och spanar på när jag omnämner honom. Nu har han kommenterat mitt inlägg här, på en annan Talk sida. Ger inget bra intryck för mig --Janwikifoto (talk) 11:06, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

I'd like to see that - "han kommenterat mitt inlägg". Where is it? --85.194.16.237 12:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

So would I. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, did not see your comment. Sida https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Josve05a text "Canvassing? 1989 (talk) 02:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)", in section about 1989. --Janwikifoto (talk) 16:25, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Trued Family of N. Sandby.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Sandberg Family, Knuts Johan of Barberget.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:11, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear SergeWoodzing,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Niels Lan Doky 2015.JPG

File:Niels Lan Doky 2015.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Claudio.Copenaghen (talk) 13:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Default sorting

Hi!

Ok, but you mean just royal, or also some ranks of nobility? I think it's probably better to take out the Hessensteins from the Category: House of Hesse, to avoid confusions between defaultsorts by first and/or last name. Mhmrodrigues (talk) 13:15, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Let's go back to your talk page with this, and not discuss it on two different pages. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:58, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Mynewsdesk

Note to self. See Commons:Bad_sources#Mynewsdesk.com! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 23:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Also this consensus. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Note to self re: purging cache

Information following "Gadget:" on Help:Purge. See also COM:FAQ#PURGE. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:56, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Carl-Erik Olivebring 1970.jpg

Copyright status: File:Carl-Erik Olivebring 1970.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Carl-Erik Olivebring 1970.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 17:56, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Högberga, Luvika, Gunnar Klys 1944.jpg

Copyright status: File:Högberga, Luvika, Gunnar Klys 1944.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Högberga, Luvika, Gunnar Klys 1944.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 21:23, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Carl-Erik Olivebring 1970.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Carl-Erik Olivebring 1970.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Carl-Erik Olivebring 1970.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Jcb (talk) 22:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Eric the Lisper & Halter of Sweden (Eric XI) c. 1240.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Eric the Lisper & Halter of Sweden (Eric XI) c. 1240.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Eric the Lisper & Halter of Sweden (Eric XI) c. 1240.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Jcb (talk) 22:38, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vasagatan 13, Borlänge, Gunnar Klys 1940.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vasagatan 13, Borlänge, Gunnar Klys 1940.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vasagatan 13, Borlänge, Gunnar Klys 1940.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Jcb (talk) 22:39, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Vasagatan 13, Borlänge, Gunnar Klys 1940.jpg

Copyright status: File:Vasagatan 13, Borlänge, Gunnar Klys 1940.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vasagatan 13, Borlänge, Gunnar Klys 1940.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 22:40, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Högberga, Luvika, Gunnar Klys 1944.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Högberga, Luvika, Gunnar Klys 1944.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Högberga, Luvika, Gunnar Klys 1944.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Jcb (talk) 22:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Warning

Do not add the Southerly Club template to files from authors that are not listed in the template. Jcb (talk) 00:08, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Oh, and apparently you are unaware, but I am an administrator at Wikimedia Commons. Also I am the OTRS agent who handled the Southerly Club OTRS ticket back in 2010. Jcb (talk) 00:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I havce missed tha fact that you are an administrator. We beed neutal input from another one. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 00:19, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Re email

I and other administrators on here are volunteer editors with more technical rights. If you need contact a Wikimedia staff member try User:Mdennis_(WMF) instead. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 01:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Anna Princess of Sweden

Are you happy with the sourcing of this image? See http://runeberg.org/svestorman/0133.html the book it comes from http://runeberg.org/svestorman/0001.html and http://runeberg.org/

The nearest I can get to your problem https://www.altesses.eu/princes_max.php?image=68687a0b25

Regards Broichmore (talk) 18:04, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

The Runeberg image is a horizontally reversed drawing based on this portrait. The woman is Princess Anna of Sweden, sister of King Sigmund (Sigismund) III Vasa of Poland.

The other two child portraits are of the same King Sigmund's children, neither one is of his sister.

Thank you for asking! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:47, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Skoklosters kyrka - KMB - 16000200130358.jpg

You think it is on exterior of the Skokloster kyrka? It is a fabric, it should be inside. Macuser (talk) 11:24, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

It was originally there a very long time ago. Has been in a Stockholm museum since then. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:30, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

See this category. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Kriestovo_Nysian

I revert him globally, he is W sock, here is what I clean after him. Special:Contributions/37.47.0.0/16 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.47.68.236 (talk) 09:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Who? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:38, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Thesaurus Nummorum Sueo-Gothoricorum 1731 Tab I.jpg

@SergeWoodzing: Hi! Do you really think that "Olav Fratelia" and "Biorno" are real kings? The list of Swedish monarchs shows that Eric the Victorious (Erik Segersall, whose coins are shown in the bottom left) is the first historical king! In the categorization I've identified the historical monarchs (Eric the Victorious and Olaf the Scotking). The ones above are mythological, and as they have no specific category, I categorized them in "Mythological kings of Sweden". Are my editions so hard to understand? Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 17:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

There are mythological kings and also real kings depicted there. That's what now has been recategorized. What you did wrong was removing one of the 2 categories rather than just adding the mythological. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

File rename

Hi SergeWoodzing, Thanks for your thanks! :), I haven't done file renaming since 2019 but saw there were over 200 files needing to be renamed so figured if no one else is going to bother than I might as well lol, Although not my fault sorry you've had to wait a month for the rename.
Anyway hope you and yours are well :), Take care and stay safe, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 19:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Delightful. Same to you. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:55, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Category:Fred_Kallaste

Fred Kallaste has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 07:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

??? What is this, and why is it ion my talk page? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Osmaklig uppladdning av smygtagna bilder

Hej SergeWoodzing! Trevligt att du bidrar med bilder till WikiCommons. Det finns många hål att fylla med bra eller riktigt bra bilder. Men undvik gärna den här typen av smygtagna bilder i samband med begravningar. Till råga på allt en ytterst undermålig sådan, rent tekniskt. Sned och dann, oskarp och överexponerad. Bland mycket annat. En bild som aldrig kommer att finna sin publik, varken av någon enskild eller något media som vill ladda ner den. Eller att den kommer att ingå i en artikel på Wikipedia. Och det är ju därför man laddar upp bilder, eller hur? För att de ska fylla en funktion någonstans. Bästa wiki-hälsningar /Justeraren (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Om du vill att bilden raderas ska du ansöka om det så saken får diskuteras konstruktivt, inte skriva här med sådana ordval. Den är inte smygtagen. No further comments. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Bäste SergeWoodzing! Att bilden är smygtagen är ju UPPENBAR för varje betraktare! Alla bilder som inte föregåtts av en fråga till fotoobjekten är - per definition - smygtagna! I övrigt har du laddat upp några trevliga bilder som jag inte har något att invända mot. Fortsätt så. Med vänlig hälsning, Justeraren (talk) 18:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Your accusations about "sneak photos" border on a personal attack. Personal attacks are not allowed in this project. The photographer was standing next to the family of the deceased when the photo was taken. Please stay away from this talk page if personal attacks and nasty condescending theories are what you came here for. We are not here to pass judgement on other users.--SergeWoodzing (talk) 00:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)