User talk:Wilfredor/Archive 53

File:Test 11120.jpg

 
File:Test 11120.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 22:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

-- Kulmalukko (talk) 22:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Advice required please

If I wanted to upload multiple images from a pdf or a website, what Wikimedia tool COM:UT should I use? What do you recommend? --BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Chamos en ventana (285014806).jpg

 
File:Chamos en ventana (285014806).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Richard Avery (talk) 11:08, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Afifa Afrin (talk) 05:15, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

File:A Raglan Sunset (4347710508).jpg

 
File:A Raglan Sunset (4347710508).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ganímedes (talk) 01:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Después de la llovizna (1082176465).jpg

 
File:Después de la llovizna (1082176465).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ganímedes (talk) 22:45, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Cargando a Kirikú que toca su popote (4449335412).jpg

 
File:Cargando a Kirikú que toca su popote (4449335412).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Richard Avery (talk) 11:27, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

File:El fiestón de aniversario de Praxis (2946926869).jpg

 
File:El fiestón de aniversario de Praxis (2946926869).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Richard Avery (talk) 09:14, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Elefunk (3920960086).jpg

 
File:Elefunk (3920960086).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Richard Avery (talk) 11:46, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Waling through a pretty path (7618792044).jpg

 
File:Waling through a pretty path (7618792044).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntonioK talk 12:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Estación segura (5825653358).jpg

 
File:Estación segura (5825653358).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Richard Avery (talk) 19:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

 
File:Rachelle in The Early Evening Sunshine (14880637121).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 08:15, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, Québec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'église Saint-François d'Assise à Limoilou.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:48, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-François d'Assise church, Limoilou, Québec city, Quebec State, Canadá.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Not really constructive

For this rollback of 84.46.53.112 your vigilance was not really needed wrt the edit histories of Help:POTY etc.84.46.53.184 18:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Naked Split (4191276418).jpg

 
File:Naked Split (4191276418).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:30, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Notre-Dame-des-Victoires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:39, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lévis-Québec Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:39, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de Paris, Québec ville, Québec, Cánada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:39, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Self portrait (8056143727).jpg

 
File:Self portrait (8056143727).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jon Kolbert (talk) 10:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roue de barre et Figure de proue du navire l'Alert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 04:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La croix celtique du Parc-de-l'Artillerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:55, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux-Québec 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:42, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:The Photographer/common.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 6 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');
  2. ISSUE: line 17 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');
  3. ISSUE: line 41 character 33: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: console.log($( this ))

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 23:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:The Photographer/common.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 5 character 64: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: $( this ).find("a").last().attr('href').split(":")[1]

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 01:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Samuel-De Champlain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:59, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux-Québec 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux-Québec 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:The Photographer/common.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 14 character 59: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: return mw.config.get('wgCanonicalSpecialPageName')

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 23:34, 18 April 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:The Photographer/common.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 28 character 38: 'multiple' is already defined. - Evidence: function multiple(valor, multiple)

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 00:13, 19 April 2018 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quebec City 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments You could check the perspective on the right handside and give a better description, too. --Basotxerri 13:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
  Done Basotxerri Thanks --The Photographer 18:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Please don't forget to check the image description... Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:34, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:The Photographer/common.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 2 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 6 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');
  2. ISSUE: line 17 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 00:20, 20 April 2018 (UTC).

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 82 character 20: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: } )

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 23:48, 21 April 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 8 character 23: Possible strict violation. - Evidence: api = this;
  2. ISSUE: line 59 character 25: 'editSection' is already defined. - Evidence: function editSection( summary, section, content) {
  3. ISSUE: line 130 character 19: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: )

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 00:03, 22 April 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 6 column 47: Unexpected token (

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 00:13, 22 April 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 2 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 9 character 19: Possible strict violation. - Evidence: api = this;
  2. ISSUE: line 68 character 1: Expected '(end)' and instead saw '}'. - Evidence: });

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 01:36, 22 April 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 2 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 6 character 19: 'editToken' is already defined. - Evidence: var editToken = mw.user.tokens.get('editToken')
  2. ISSUE: line 6 character 52: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var editToken = mw.user.tokens.get('editToken')

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 02:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 61 character 37: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: var results = new RegExp('[\?&]section=([^&#]*)').exec(url);

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 03:10, 22 April 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 62 character 37: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: var results = new RegExp('[\?&]section=([^&#]*)').exec(url);
  2. ISSUE: line 98 character 32: A constructor name should start with an uppercase letter. - Evidence: $(this).append(new createCombo ());

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 04:13, 22 April 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 62 character 37: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: var results = new RegExp('[\?&]section=([^&#]*)').exec(url);
  2. ISSUE: line 97 character 14: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: v

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 04:16, 22 April 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 62 character 37: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: var results = new RegExp('[\?&]section=([^&#]*)').exec(url);

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 04:23, 22 April 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 62 character 37: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: var results = new RegExp('[\?&]section=([^&#]*)').exec(url);
  2. ISSUE: line 112 character 32: 'comment' is already defined. - Evidence: var comment=prompt("Please enter a comment","");

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 04:38, 22 April 2018 (UTC).

Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 62 character 37: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: var results = new RegExp('[\?&]section=([^&#]*)').exec(url);
  2. ISSUE: line 112 character 54: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence: if (comment.trim() && comment.length == 0) {$(this).val(''); return '';}
  3. ISSUE: line 119 character 32: 'comment' is already defined. - Evidence: var comment=prompt("Please enter a comment","");

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 04:47, 22 April 2018 (UTC).

File:Gold Hill Photo by Matt Pinner (20294371416).jpg

 
File:Gold Hill Photo by Matt Pinner (20294371416).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WereSpielChequers (talk) 09:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building in Avenida Paulista, Brazil 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 81 character 37: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: var results = new RegExp('[\?&]section=([^&#]*)').exec(url);
  2. ISSUE: line 160 character 78: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: let newNomination = nomination[0].replace(new RegExp(escapeRegExp("/\{\{\/(Nomination|Promotion|Decline|Discuss)\|"), "g"),'{{/'+type+'|');
  3. ISSUE: line 160 character 80: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: let newNomination = nomination[0].replace(new RegExp(escapeRegExp("/\{\{\/(Nomination|Promotion|Decline|Discuss)\|"), "g"),'{{/'+type+'|');
  4. ISSUE: line 160 character 122: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: let newNomination = nomination[0].replace(new RegExp(escapeRegExp("/\{\{\/(Nomination|Promotion|Decline|Discuss)\|"), "g"),'{{/'+type+'|');

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 01:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 14 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 82 character 37: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: var results = new RegExp('[\?&]section=([^&#]*)').exec(url);
  2. ISSUE: line 163 character 127: Expected ')' and instead saw 'text'. - Evidence: newNomination = _remplaceLast(newNomination,"}}","<br />" + comment + " --[[User talk:The Photographer|<span style="text-shadow:gray 2px 2px 1px;"><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="blue"><b>The Photographer</b></font></span>]] 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)}}");
  3. ISSUE: line 163 character 138: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: newNomination = _remplaceLast(newNomination,"}}","<br />" + comment + " --[[User talk:The Photographer|<span style="text-shadow:gray 2px 2px 1px;"><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="blue"><b>The Photographer</b></font></span>]] 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)}}");
  4. ISSUE: line 163 character 138: Expected '}' to match '{' from line 157 and instead saw ':'. - Evidence: newNomination = _remplaceLast(newNomination,"}}","<br />" + comment + " --[[User talk:The Photographer|<span style="text-shadow:gray 2px 2px 1px;"><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="blue"><b>The Photographer</b></font></span>]] 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)}}");
  5. ISSUE: line 163 character 144: Unexpected '2'. - Evidence: newNomination = _remplaceLast(newNomination,"}}","<br />" + comment + " --[[User talk:The Photographer|<span style="text-shadow:gray 2px 2px 1px;"><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="blue"><b>The Photographer</b></font></span>]] 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)}}");
  6. ISSUE: line 163 character 143: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: newNomination = _remplaceLast(newNomination,"}}","<br />" + comment + " --[[User talk:The Photographer|<span style="text-shadow:gray 2px 2px 1px;"><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="blue"><b>The Photographer</b></font></span>]] 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)}}");
  7. ISSUE: line 164 character 9: Expected an identifier and instead saw 'else'. - Evidence: else
  8. ISSUE: line 164 character 13: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: else
  9. ISSUE: line 165 character 122: Expected ')' and instead saw 'text'. - Evidence: newNomination = _remplaceLast(newNomination,"}}","|" + comment + " --[[User talk:The Photographer|<span style="text-shadow:gray 2px 2px 1px;"><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="blue"><b>The Photographer</b></font></span>]] 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)}}");
  10. ISSUE: line 165 character 133: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: newNomination = _remplaceLast(newNomination,"}}","|" + comment + " --[[User talk:The Photographer|<span style="text-shadow:gray 2px 2px 1px;"><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="blue"><b>The Photographer</b></font></span>]] 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)}}");
  11. ISSUE: line 165 character 133: Expected '}' to match '{' from line 2 and instead saw ':'. - Evidence: newNomination = _remplaceLast(newNomination,"}}","|" + comment + " --[[User talk:The Photographer|<span style="text-shadow:gray 2px 2px 1px;"><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="blue"><b>The Photographer</b></font></span>]] 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)}}");
  12. ISSUE: line 165 character 134: Expected ')' and instead saw 'gray'. - Evidence: newNomination = _remplaceLast(newNomination,"}}","|" + comment + " --[[User talk:The Photographer|<span style="text-shadow:gray 2px 2px 1px;"><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="blue"><b>The Photographer</b></font></span>]] 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)}}");
  13. ISSUE: line 165 character 139: Unexpected '2'. - Evidence: newNomination = _remplaceLast(newNomination,"}}","|" + comment + " --[[User talk:The Photographer|<span style="text-shadow:gray 2px 2px 1px;"><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="blue"><b>The Photographer</b></font></span>]] 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)}}");
  14. ISSUE: line 165 character 138: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: newNomination = _remplaceLast(newNomination,"}}","|" + comment + " --[[User talk:The Photographer|<span style="text-shadow:gray 2px 2px 1px;"><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="blue"><b>The Photographer</b></font></span>]] 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)}}");
  15. ISSUE: line 167 character 5: Expected '(end)' and instead saw '}'. - Evidence: }

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 01:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC).

Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 163 column 124: Unexpected identifier

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 01:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saúde Street Market 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:34, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Civa (talk) 09:23, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

  The Quality Image Barnstar

This barnstar is for the The Photographer for his cool QIC voting script. Thank you very much! --Basotxerri (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Gadget

Hi,

Seen your question on #mediawiki-tech.

This tutorial during Berlin hackathon was useful for Gadgets development with ResourceLoader support:

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gadget_kitchen/Training

--Dereckson (talk) 20:32, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Québec city skyline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:51, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Québec city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:51, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine de Tourny in Quebec City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:The Photographer/QICvote temp.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:The Photographer/QICvote temp.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 109 character 28: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var buttonBg = null
  2. ISSUE: line 180 character 37: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: var results = new RegExp("[\?&]section=([^&#]*)").exec(url);

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 22:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC).

Return to the user page of "Wilfredor/Archive 53".