Category talk:Images from the Deutsche Fotothek wrong file

Latest comment: 14 years ago by D.W. in topic Discussion

df pk 0000155 095 edit

There seem to be problems with this files. --Martin H. (talk) 23:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The following lists all files from Fotothek df pk 0000155 with their filenme here and the correct "album"

List 0000155 edit

Comment 0000155 edit

End of 0000155. The Fotothek indicates the number of media files in an album or series (the two series are Kartoffelernte und Porzellanmanufaktur, the other images are not part of a series). Some images from the albums or series have higher numbers. To complete all albums and series now started with the above listing (except the series Porzelanmanufaktur):

The errors continue in the following 0000156 and 0000157. So maybe not only those 3 images require rename and correction but maybe more. So now the listing for 156 and 157 (including the already started Porzelanmanufaktur which will continue in 0000157 001).

List 0000156 edit

Comment 0000156 edit

0000156 complete. I used the short series name for the portraits, not that long undescriptive thing they already have. To complete the series some images belong together, we dont have all:

List 0000157 edit

Comment 0000157 edit

0000157 complete, ends with 044. The series 'Ansichten von Meissen' contains 75 Media files, we have here in 0000157 the files 67 to 75 (see fotothek), the other 66 files are in 0000154, see prefix search. So hopefully its complete now. --Martin H. (talk) 00:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

OK, so first we match the pictures with Fotothek database to have the correct photos for all series, missing photos have to be uploaded additional? I don´t understand the problem yet ;) Is it just wrong file names and links to Fotothek and we got all photos?--D.W. (talk) 15:08, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
The files at Commons match the Fotothek already, I first thought not therefore this category name. But filenames are wrong and also all metadata (file description) is wrong and requires correction. Missing photos are not yet uploaded (Fotothek upload stucks at ~60,000 of 250,000 files) or not included in the partnership. The numbers 0000154-0000157 are completely transfered. Yes, lets first match the source, then correct the wrong identifications and errors. --Martin H. (talk) 15:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Like this? I hope the field Datensatz-ID is identical to Objektdokument number from Fotothek.--D.W. (talk) 19:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes, +file rename. Also there is much more information at Fotothek, we are still at the example 0000157 019, which belongs to the 0000154 images 'Ansichten von Meissen'. Why dont we have the detailed information from the series http://www.deutschefotothek.de/obj88930245.html? --Martin H. (talk) 00:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Was zur Hölle, die haben richtige Bildbeschreibungen?!? That´s strange...I really hope that the next uploads take so much time because they want to integrate them. But OK, there also many useless descriptions ("Foto")..In the meantime it would be good to change the german description of "52df" (like Ansichten von Meißen) to something like "Bilderserie"? There is a request for renaming ;)--D.W. (talk) 17:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Bitte jetzt kein Flickwerk an einzelnen Bildern, dass macht die Lösung des Gesamtproblems nur schwerer, nicht leichter. Please no individual fixes, thats only makes it more complicated. Im convinced, that Multichill can help us sooner or later, or name someone who can do this. --Martin H. (talk) 18:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Don´t know. Categories are already fixed, right? So the rest would wait till 2020 or so...if they deliver the data in the same way as the present there photos on their page (what a bad Java bullshit..) it will be faster to do individual than to program a bot ;-)--D.W. (talk) 19:13, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Images from the Deutsche Fotothek wrong file" page.