Commons:Кандидаты в избранные изображения
Кандидаты в избранные изображения на других языках:
Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/− |
Shortcut: COM:FPC Если вы считаете, что нашли или создали изображение, достойное стать избранным,— пожалуйста, добавьте его в нижеследующий раздел Кандидаты. Если в течение 9 дней ваше предложение будет принято собществом, то изображению будет присвоено звание избранного. Пожалуйста, обратите внимание: избранные изображения не имеют прямого отношения к Изображениям дня (однако выбор изображений дня производится преимущественно из «избранных изображений»).
Кандидаты edit
Для того чтобы проголосовать или добавить новое изображение-кандидат, перейдите по этой ссылке
Featured picture candidates edit
File:Self-portrait in a Straw Hat by Elisabeth-Louise Vigée-Lebrun.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 17:19:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings
- Info Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun, Self-portrait in a Straw Hat, 1782 - uploaded by Aavindraa - nominated by --Thi (talk) 17:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 17:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Les Joueurs de cartes, par Paul Cézanne.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 11:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Duos_(depictions_of_two_people)
- Info The Card Players by Paul Cézanne - uploaded by Yann - nominated by --Thi (talk) 11:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 11:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, that was in my list of FPC. Yann (talk) 11:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 14:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mosaïque Façade de la porte de la mosaïque d sidi-el-haloui.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2024 at 23:13:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info created by Terki hassaine samir - uploaded by Terki hassaine samir - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I've a appreciation for the Islamic style. ★ 00:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Parc Culturel De l'Ahaggar (91).JPG edit
Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2024 at 21:55:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography
- Info created by Hamza-sia - uploaded by Hamza-sia - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I consider it as a QI, but not an FP Chepry (talk) 11:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Chepry could you please provide further elaboration? Riad Salih (talk) 11:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's just a nice photo with decent quality and resolution. No "wow" effect at all, sorry. Also it's pretty noisy with strange compression artifacts (you can see it clearly in darker areas). Composition could be better by i.e. aligning ripple marks with frame diagonal. New category is much better, but from texture photography I expect exceptional quality. Chepry (talk) 14:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Chepry could you please provide further elaboration? Riad Salih (talk) 11:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice textures. FP to me. @Riad Salih: consider to replace the category to Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography. ★ 12:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Riad Salih (talk) 13:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Flat light and not an appealing composition to me. For example, the composition of File:Parc Culturel De l'Ahaggar (25).JPG is much better IMO (but not sure it has the technical quality for FP). BigDom (talk) 13:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing outstanding. Wolverine XI 16:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Sawpit Gorge, Ord River.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2024 at 12:15:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Western Australia
- Info created and uploaded by Jtagi - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 12:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, and like the colors and the composition. Yann (talk) 12:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Campbell water tower, aerial view.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2024 at 07:18:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#United_States
- Info The iconic water tower in downtown Campbell, CA; created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 07:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 07:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unappealing suburban background. Definitely a QI, but not an FP. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Image composition and view is particularly poor. Wolverine XI 16:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 33.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 20:51:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Portrait of a young woman from the Laarim Tribe, Kimotong, Kapoeta State, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and perfect.--Ermell (talk) 21:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another great one. Cmao20 (talk) 01:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great photo in your expected and usual quality. It would be nice to read her name (if she agrees). - Je-str (talk) 08:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Definite FP composition and technical quality. Could you spend 20 minutes improving the black background around the subject. Boring work, but needed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, I spent 15 min to improve the dark area, I hope you see a difference Poco a poco (talk) 20:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks, but the extra 5 minutes would have been worth it... Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Charlesjsharp: my understanding is that I did in 15 min what you asked me to do in 20 min. If there are any issues peding to be adressed, could you add a note? I'd fix them, of course. --Poco a poco (talk) 14:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- When you pixel peep there are still grey areas all around the subject. No big deal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, Charles, there you go 15 + 5 now :) Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 09:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 07:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Île d'Orléans 048.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 16:28:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Canada
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ahem... There really is no reason to flip the finger in the way you do on the permission parameter. You have already been generous enough to supply the cc-zero license. Just because some people here and on the internet are a-holes, you don't need to pick up that behavior too. There are enough bad vibes going around here to power up a small city; we don't need more of that. Please. --Cart (talk) 19:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- sorry I removed it Wilfredor (talk) 20:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! That was kind of you. --Cart (talk) 20:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Tangentially, why is {{WTFPL}} even a template? While I myself have no problem with "Permission is granted to do what the fuck you want to with this document under the terms of the WTF Public License, Version 2." (and take it very lightheartedly), Commons is a multilingual wiki and not everyone (especially non-native English speakers) will perceive it that way. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- The reason why I asked Wilfredor to remove it was simply because I think we owe it to readers and the people re-using our photos to be met with a civilized tone when they view our best pictures. The bitter aftermath from recent licensing discussions should not spill over to the more "official" part of Commons. Imagine an 8 year-old looking for a picture of an old Canadian house for their school project and be met with that wording. Personally and IRL, I swear a lot, in several languages (you should hear me in Spanish!), but there is a time and place for everything. This is not about how much crude language we editors are comfortable with, but how we present Commons to the rest of the world. I think we could add FPs to the quote. ;-) Regarding the template, since there is an article about it, I guess someone thought it was a good joke to create the template. Templates can be used for so many things, not just for Commons official things. There are plenty of personal and other minor templates. --Cart (talk) 10:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I casually swear a lot in English IRL (sometimes even on-wiki when appropriate), but agreed that this is not the place for it. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- The reason why I asked Wilfredor to remove it was simply because I think we owe it to readers and the people re-using our photos to be met with a civilized tone when they view our best pictures. The bitter aftermath from recent licensing discussions should not spill over to the more "official" part of Commons. Imagine an 8 year-old looking for a picture of an old Canadian house for their school project and be met with that wording. Personally and IRL, I swear a lot, in several languages (you should hear me in Spanish!), but there is a time and place for everything. This is not about how much crude language we editors are comfortable with, but how we present Commons to the rest of the world. I think we could add FPs to the quote. ;-) Regarding the template, since there is an article about it, I guess someone thought it was a good joke to create the template. Templates can be used for so many things, not just for Commons official things. There are plenty of personal and other minor templates. --Cart (talk) 10:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Is this just an ordinary house? I think it's a good picture anyway, and I think a well-lit, well-composed photo of an ordinary house ought to be a possible subject for an FP. Cmao20 (talk) 01:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Atmospheric and well composed photo of an old but working house. You could argue about the two cropped chairs (that actually mirrors each other), but testing cropping them out makes it looks like a museum. Now you get the sense that this interior continues throughout the house. I'm glad to see that you brought your skill for photographing inside houses with you, all the way from Venezuela to Canada. --Cart (talk) 14:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- This house brings back good memories for me. It's located in a secluded area of a rural zone on the island of Orleans, Quebec. A picturesque place surrounded by gardens of vegetables and fruits around the house, and close by, a stable with goats, egg-laying hens, and further away, a wheat plantation with a beautiful old barn that, in the afternoon light, seemed as if the roof was honey-colored. Nearby, a small stream flows. My wife and I went to this place to spend much of her pregnancy there, which brought her peace and tranquility, although soon after came the most difficult event of my life: the loss of our baby at 4 months of gestation, which among other things ended our years-long relationship. I mention all this because I took a photo in front of that house where she was sitting in an old rocking chair, holding her belly with a smile and her eyes closed—probably the most beautiful featured image I ever took, but I had to delete it because keeping it would be torture. Moreover, she and I are no longer together. I know this has nothing to do with this photo but I wanted to provide some context. Behind every photo, there's an additional story. I don't care if this photo is featured or not, this is not a chatgpt speech to manipulate anything. Wilfredor (talk) 18:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- We understand. No ChatGPT could sound so sad. Sometimes you just need to say things to lighten the burden of carrying it. --Cart (talk) 23:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cart. – Aristeas (talk) 19:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Celastrus scandens fruit.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 14:52:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Celastraceae
- Info: fruit of American bittersweet; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tunisian tortoise (Testudo graeca nabeulensis) male Cap Bon 2.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 09:05:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Testudinidae (Tortoises)
- Info My recent tortoise nomination failed to make the grade. A couple of people suggested this photo of the same guy as a possible FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I liked the other one too but this is cool Cmao20 (talk) 14:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support: disturbed environment is much less obvious in this one --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 09:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Trier, 07-12-2023 (actm.) 01.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 04:19:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
- Info Trier, Alter Krahn on the Mosel captured in a fine interplay of lines.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this interweaving of shadows and perspective (also in the background) that help each other by creating continuity to the composition. --Terragio67 (talk) 09:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Yerevan, Brandy barrels, Armenia.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2024 at 20:57:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Winemaking
Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Texture_photography - Info An underground cellar with old oak barrels where five to twenty year old wine distillates mature to produce an aged liquor. The location is the Yerevan Brandy/Cognac Factory (est. 1887) underground cellars, Yerevan, Armenia. The same basic blending and aging technology is shared by a number of high-end producers from countries such as Armenia, Russia (Dagestan), Italy, Spain, France (the pioneer of brandy making) and others. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The composition was chosen to reveal a large, repeating geometric pattern as a side effect for texture photography. -- Argenberg (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool idea Cmao20 (talk) 00:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support agreed. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could it be a bit less yellow please? Yann (talk) 09:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yann, I’ve reduced the color temperature (-200 kelvin on the Lightroom scale). I believe 3600K is very close the ambient lighting of the scene. --Argenberg (talk) 13:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Could you reduce the noise a bit? Poco a poco (talk) 21:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I’ve learned to appreciate fine luminance noise, here it blends organically into the oak wood fiber, but OK, here’s a version with more noise control. --Argenberg (talk) 13:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Seaside Sanatorium (40873p).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2024 at 20:09:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
- Info The Seaside Sanatorium is a historic medical facility in Connecticut designed by Cass Gilbert. It was the first institution built specifically for "heliotropic treatment" for tuberculosis. The treatment had to do with the role of vitamin D in fighting the disease. Not long thereafter, though, a vaccine was developed, making the treatment unnecessary. It served a couple other purposes before permanently closing. Now it's a public park. It's an unusual space, so I put together a panorama of the building. The other version is nice in that it includes part of the beach, but I think this is the better combination of composition/light. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really interesting Cmao20 (talk) 00:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Put down highlights. white bldg on right side is too strong. Even red bricks would seem beter. --Mile (talk) 08:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Yellow-rumped warbler singing (41612).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2024 at 20:00:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Parulidae_(New_World_Warblers)
- Info male yellow-rumped warbler (Setophaga coronata) singing. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Lamp maker, Medina of Marrakech.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2024 at 14:35:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
- Info Lamp maker, Medina of Marrakech. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 14:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 14:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, something different. Well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 18:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I would have preferred trade some ISO for faster shutter here, but I like the subject and compo. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Münstertal 04.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2024 at 08:28:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 18:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Don't you just wish you could tilt the roundabout! Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support You can want something, but the reality is different and also beautiful.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Aigle royal Tlemcen.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 23:35:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Aquila
- Info created by Terki hassaine samir - uploaded by Terki hassaine samir - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Either not in focus or somehow too soft. Could be camera limitations but 1/250 sec not usually fast enough for hand-held shot using 280mm. F5.6 has restricted DoF. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. Great close up in small size but at full size I agree the focus has been missed. Cmao20 (talk) 18:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Riad Salih (talk) 21:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
File:068 Mountain gorilla close-up at Bwindi Impenetrable Forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 22:18:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Hominidae (Great_Apes)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
OpposeI'm sorry to oppose another gorilla FPC. But this shot cannot compare, in my opinion, to shots like this.The over-exposed areas are the main problem. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)- Thank you for your review. I just uploaded a new file with highlights edited. In my opinion, this image is more interesting than the one you linked because : 1) the sun is illuminating the mountain gorilla eyes, showing all the beauty of their color in the sun; 2) The eyes of the mountain gorilla image you linked have barely no details distinguishable; 3) I've seen almost no other image on the internet showing how the mountain gorilla eyes are when illuminated by direct sun light. Giles Laurent (talk) 11:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Gorilla eyes and more gorilla eyes Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- None of your linked gorillas are illuminated by sunlight. Both of your linked gorillas are looking on the far left or far right. First link only show eyes and not the face. Giles Laurent (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment FPC is a wonderful place where you can learn so much. Ordinary mortals (like yours truly) would be scrupulous about always citing examples of other photographers in such matters, but certainly not their own insignificant works, to avoid any impression of vanity. But great men are free from such false considerations, and I can only admire Charles’ generosity in liberally presenting us with outstanding examples of his own artistry in his gracious comments. We can all learn a lot from these grandiose gestures. – Aristeas (talk) 08:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I bow before a great man and ordinary mortal. Although I always thought great men wouldn't need to use sarcasm. FPC is a competition and I'm sorry if the existing FPs I referenced are my own. On another current FP nomination I reference a better image that is not my own. You have also possibly not noticed that when I opposed this nomination it was horribly overexposed; there was also a distracting twig. I am now neutral about it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question ... when you say FPC is a competition, are you being sarcastic? Kritzolina (talk) 10:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed... Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- ... which makes me wonder ... but no, I will not continue. Kritzolina (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed... Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question ... when you say FPC is a competition, are you being sarcastic? Kritzolina (talk) 10:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I bow before a great man and ordinary mortal. Although I always thought great men wouldn't need to use sarcasm. FPC is a competition and I'm sorry if the existing FPs I referenced are my own. On another current FP nomination I reference a better image that is not my own. You have also possibly not noticed that when I opposed this nomination it was horribly overexposed; there was also a distracting twig. I am now neutral about it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment FPC is a wonderful place where you can learn so much. Ordinary mortals (like yours truly) would be scrupulous about always citing examples of other photographers in such matters, but certainly not their own insignificant works, to avoid any impression of vanity. But great men are free from such false considerations, and I can only admire Charles’ generosity in liberally presenting us with outstanding examples of his own artistry in his gracious comments. We can all learn a lot from these grandiose gestures. – Aristeas (talk) 08:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- None of your linked gorillas are illuminated by sunlight. Both of your linked gorillas are looking on the far left or far right. First link only show eyes and not the face. Giles Laurent (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Gorilla eyes and more gorilla eyes Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I just uploaded a new file with highlights edited. In my opinion, this image is more interesting than the one you linked because : 1) the sun is illuminating the mountain gorilla eyes, showing all the beauty of their color in the sun; 2) The eyes of the mountain gorilla image you linked have barely no details distinguishable; 3) I've seen almost no other image on the internet showing how the mountain gorilla eyes are when illuminated by direct sun light. Giles Laurent (talk) 11:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A characterful portrait. Cmao20 (talk) 18:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support the light makes this a good portrait. I'd recommend cloning out that little twig in the top-right, though -- it's bright enough to be distracting. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Done, new file uploaded -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A characterful, expressive image. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would still put white/highlight down. --Mile (talk) 16:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The light makes this special, indeed. Thank you for capturing this, Giles Laurent! --Kritzolina (talk) 18:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Giles… ★ 00:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Igreja de Nosso Senhor do Bonfim Salvador Bahia Fitas do Senhor do Bonfim 2021-7107.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 20:44:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
- Info Ribbons of the Church of Nosso Senhor do Bonfim, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Prburley - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 20:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes. – Aristeas (talk) 18:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I like a colorful subject, but I don't think this narrow DoF and composition quite do the subject justice. Maybe closer, maybe further away, maybe more DoF? It's a difficult call, but for me it falls just slightly on the side of oppose. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support: a higher f-number would make sense here. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rhododendrites. --Ermell (talk) 21:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rhododendrites. -- Karelj (talk) 09:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Fiestas de San Juan Bautista (Nueva Esparta, Venezuela) 06.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 19:10:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created, uploaded, and nominated by WiloJedi -- WiloJedi (talk) 19:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WiloJedi (talk) 19:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not exceptional in any way. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like it. Good quality and a fun variety of interesting items. Shame about the out of focus item in the foreground. Cmao20 (talk) 18:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just a comment: these copyrighted objects are not permanently fixed, so this may have some COM:FOP problems. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very restless and too many truncated elements. --XRay 💬 07:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Xray. -- Karelj (talk) 09:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Moral support I like the composition and the colors. Yann (talk) 09:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Honor guard at Mausoleum of Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 09:43:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing_people
- Info Honor guard at Mausoleum of Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco. My work. --Mile (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Berthold Werner (talk) 15:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Off-centre? --SHB2000 (talk) 05:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment He isnt in center, neither me, neither vertical of doors is. --Mile (talk) 07:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, that ruins the compo for me. Oppose. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 15:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Curious if you asked him to pose, or if this is his natural "guard face"? :) — Rhododendrites talk | 20:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- @talk He is there all day, they have exchange around noon, maybe later. 4 doors - 4 guards, than inside too (each corner), and horse outside complex (2 cavarlyman). --Mile (talk) 08:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Balanced symmetrical composition, good lighting and technical quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Like the image but would have tried cropping tighter all around to remove the dark lines at the edges and bring the guard closer in the frame. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done GRDN711 Right you are, i think contrast is better now, passing from white on color guard and doors. It wasnt so much bringing closer but contrast is better. --Mile (talk) 09:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Catania Cathedral from the Abbey of St Agatha1.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 05:13:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info: Catania Cathedral viewed from the Abbey of St Agatha; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not bad for a cell phone shot--Ermell (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Boehmeria nivea. 31-03-2024 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 04:32:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Urticaceae
- Info Red emerging young shoot of a Boehmeria nivea. Focus stack of 21 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Perth (AU), View from Kings Park -- 2019 -- 0525-30.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 01:32:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Australia
- Info created and uploaded by XRay - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 01:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 02:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Shame about the dull light, but, great photo Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 23:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition with the bend of the roads in the centre, the park and lower houses at the left, the water at the right … – Aristeas (talk) 18:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-25, DD 19.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2024 at 19:51:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
- Info Kid of the Laarim Tribe drinking goat milk, Kimotong, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 21:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support If the child was suckling directly from the goat it would have been perfect. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Reminds me of the Basile Borin-style works. ★ 23:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition and light. And I love his expression! Cmao20 (talk) 14:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 23:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mosque of Algiers Pillar.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2024 at 16:46:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info created by Abdellah zou - uploaded by Abdellah zou - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It needs perspective correction. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The lack of perspective correction doesn't bother me here. This isn't conventional architectural photography, it's about the colours, lines, shapes and repeating motifs. I find this photo artistically worthwhile and great fun to look at. But it is very small. Cmao20 (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I appreciate the photographer's eye -- there is a good motif in the architecture and lighting here -- but I find the composition a bit unbalanced and the standard for detail in architectural photos at FPC is higher than 3MP, sorry to say. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rhododendrites -- Chepry (talk) 07:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rhododendrites. -- Karelj (talk) 09:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Riad Salih (talk) 21:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
File:Fatima BW 2018-10-05 21-52-30.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2024 at 16:29:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Portugal
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Sorry but average quality. ★ 00:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Superb composition but I'm not sure it's sharp enough for FP. It could also do with a slight perspective correction. Cmao20 (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Stuor Dáhtá lake along the Kungsleden trail during golden hour in Kvikkjokk-Kabla fjällurskog (DSCF2557).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2024 at 14:57:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Sweden
- Info There are surprisingly few Swedish FPs. I love the reflections and the calm mood here. created by Trougnouf - uploaded by Trougnouf - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- No way! Just take a look at the Cart's work! ★ 00:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Calming and beautiful scenery. – Aristeas (talk) 16:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support :-) --Trougnouf (talk) 22:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support (-:. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful composition, but please remove the CAs. --XRay 💬 17:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done, thank you. I couldn't get the exact same development because software evolves but I tried to get as close as possible while leveraging some improvements. --Trougnouf (talk) 11:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous. Well done. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Cabinet card of William Howard Taft by Pach Brothers - Cropped to image.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2024 at 05:08:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
- Info created by Pach Brothers - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support America's fattest president. Cmao20 (talk) 14:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:CH.ZH.Langnau-am-Albis Langenberg-Wildlife-Park 2022-02-12 7587 16x9-R 5K.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2024 at 22:24:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info created by Roy Egloff - uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Would have to be a much better composition for part of a captive animal. For a close up, this is too small for FP but a much better image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and appealing portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very sharp, but that's the minimum expectation for a captive animal IMO. I don't think it's a compelling composition, with the light on its back, flat expression, and most of the body missing. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Sydney Spiny Crayfish 4239.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2024 at 18:18:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Parastacidae_(Crayfish)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question Does this species climb out of the water and go for a walk? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 22:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JJ, you've done it again. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Detail is good but I wonder the same like Charles, is this picture a real wildlife shot or setup? Poco a poco (talk) 07:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Detail is not that good. Much processing and the head-on view gives little DoF. Reflections on the right hand side are distracting.
Surely it is a staged image? More than happy to apologise to John if it isn't.Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Detail is not that good. Much processing and the head-on view gives little DoF. Reflections on the right hand side are distracting.
- Comment Charlesjsharp & Poco a poco: this specimen is standing in the water! Nevertheless, Euastacus species have the tendency to leave the water and walk about on land. Not knowing any background and adding a comment like Surely it is a staged image is imo very narrow-minded. -- Ivar (talk) 10:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- That is true for several species of crayfish. My neighbor on Gotland had a big pond with crayfish, and I would often see them on the road as they went in search of new wet areas. That way they populated a nearby small stream. --Cart (talk) 19:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice, but the unfocused reflections on the right side of the picture bother me a lot. ★ 12:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'm not sure it has enough depth of field to be FPC and I suspect JJ would not have chosen to nominate this one. It's QI but not one of his best. Cmao20 (talk) 14:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Certainly not a good illustration for an identification book. The fancy bokeh seems to indicate that this time JJ Harrison was after something else: the photo makes the crayfish look like a creature from another planet. This is indeed important and useful. When you want to fire laymen and laywomen for nature conservation etc., you must astonish them and help them to realize how many and diverse are the plants and animals of this world. For that purpose we need photos like this one. (It may seem unbelievable, but I am sure this photo is much more appealing for many “normal” people than our finest crayfish mugshots ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunately little DoF, I feel sad to have to downvote because I feel it's a good photo --Wilfredor (talk) 22:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. Also I noticed another animal just below him under the water, is it a prey or a baby crayfish ? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral - This will sound superficial, but my eyes cannot move past that bright blue area in the bottom-right. It's the brightest thing in the frame, and so different that it's where my eyes naturally rest. The detail on the face of the crawfish is excellent, and I'd probably support if I could just look past the blue speckles. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Visitors of Louvre and Nike of Samothrace.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2024 at 16:38:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 16:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too busy scene, too many people spoil the composition. --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- In choosing this particular photograph, I was aiming to capture the dynamic essence of a museum in full operation, not just its architecture. The museum as a space where people interact with art and culture helps convey the idea that the museum is more than just a container for art; it is a place of encounter, learning, and shared experience, vibrant with the presence of its visitors. Wilfredor (talk) 14:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I agree with Palauenc. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support, as per Wilfredor's comment. --RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:01, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
File:ORTH Anostostomidae Deinacrida rugosa in habitat.png edit
Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2024 at 04:00:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Animals
- Info created by Des Helmore - uploaded by Giantflightlessbirds - nominated by Giantflightlessbirds -- Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 04:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info This is one of over 1000 scientific illustrations made over a 30-year career by Des Helmore, released under an open licence by Landcare Research. Helmore was regarded as an insect illustrator with an international reputation. Several of them have value outside of scientific articles, and if the community feels they're technically proficient and significant enough I'll nominate some more. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 04:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 04:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I've never seen this massive insect, but the illustration fails to show the massive size and looks as if it fails to illustrates the typical curve of the abdomen. Does not indicate sex. Link on description page is broken. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have seen this insect in life, and that's an accurate portrayal of its proportions and of the abdomen. The wood grain is a pretty good indicator of scale I think. Sex is indicated by the ovipositor (I've added that to the description). The Landcare permissions page has been moved, thank you for picking up on that, so I've fixed the link and have run visual file change replacement on the other 1088 images. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 10:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support It seems I have seen this insect. I trust Des Helmore to make an accurate representation. This is very well drawn, and a good scan. Yann (talk) 15:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. Thanks to Giantflightlessbirds for updating all the links! – Aristeas (talk) 07:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Gustave Le Gray - An Effect of the Sun, Normandy - 1987.54 - Cleveland Museum of Art.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 21:45:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Composites (Multiple images merged into one)
- Info created by Gustave Le Gray, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Info Exploring the dramatic effects of sunlight, clouds, and water, Gustave Le Gray gained immediate recognition for his landmark photographs of the Mediterranean Sea and the English Channel taken between 1856 and 1858. At this time photographic emulsions were not equally sensitive to all colors of the spectrum, making it impossible to achieve a proper exposure for both sea and sky in a single image. Thus, for may of his seascapes Le Gray printed two negatives on a single sheet of paper, a technique called combination printing. One negative was taken of the water and the other of the sky. The overlap often apparent in such multiple negative images is not visible in this skillfully executed print. This picture is mentioned in several books about history of photography.
- Support 1856 example of what we call now HDR. -- Yann (talk) 21:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question Was vignetting an inherent part of the process or could it be avoided? Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I guess this is due to the inferior optic quality of that time. Most other images have the same effect. Yann (talk) 12:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but these are images by this photographer. A quick Google didn't find other vignetted shots from the same period. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- But if you look at photos from the same period here on Commons, for example Category:19th-century photographs of France in the Cleveland Museum of Art where this comes from, there is a mix of with or without vignetting. In those days, just like today, the quality of the photo depended a lot on the quality of the camera. It seems that this photographer had a slightly inferior camera that produced vignetting. If you look at old photos, they are sometimes cut as circles or ovals to remove some of this effect, as it was often inevitable. However, the vignetting also matched the practice of doing oval paintings, especially portraits that predated photography (some examples), so it was sometimes a desired effect. Vignetting has a long history of being a way of emphasizing a subject in paintings (Goya liked it a lot and even old Doré comes to mind), as well as photos, and still is. Commons FPC is one of the very, very few places where it is frowned upon or questioned. --Cart (talk) 17:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- My question was technical Cart, not artistic. Was vignetting an inherent part of the process? You clearly know that some cameras of the period produced vignetting. Thank you for that fact. If accurate, it answers my question. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- In this case it looks like the technical and artistic reasons coincided, so I tried to cover both to answer you question as thoroughly as possible. The more in-depth technical part of vignetting is that for old cameras, it occurs when the diameter of the hole made by the iris in the lens approaches the thickness of the material the iris is made of. So a small iris hole (high f-number) for bright light and an iris made from thick material will give you more vignetting. Old cameras didn't have the thin sophisticated iris blades we have now, sometimes it was just a hole in a plate for the light to pass through. In simple terms you could say that the vignetting is the "shadow" of the hole's wall when the light passes through it. Imperfect lenses also added to this, and they hadn't discovered petal lens hoods yet. But people liked this, and if the effect wasn't strong enough naturally, it could also be added in the darkroom by the photographer. "Photoshopping" is as old as photography. ;-) --Cart (talk) 20:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks; that makes sense. Oppose I think then I can oppose on technical or artistic grounds as you can with a smartphone image today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs) 09:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The horizon is incredibly aligned. ★ 15:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and impressive, technically and aesthetically. – Aristeas (talk) 15:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 04:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mangostim.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 20:12:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info Mangosteen fruits in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 20:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI but not FP. Corner sharpness is not very good and I just don't find the forms and shapes here that interesting. We have seen a lot of these pictures of lots of fruit arranged in a grid and I want to see something different. Cmao20 (talk) 01:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I quite like the compo which negates the corner sharpness. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I positioned the fruits myself to create an impression of a Battleship puzzle field. ★ 16:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps this would be better received if you used the Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography instead? It's up to you. --Cart (talk) 18:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm still considering to replace it. Let's wait a bit. ★ 10:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps this would be better received if you used the Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography instead? It's up to you. --Cart (talk) 18:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one is better executed than ArionStar's former candidates. Here (finally) I also have the feeling of an endless pattern. FP to me Poco a poco (talk) 07:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Cmao20. -- Karelj (talk) 09:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Somehow this photo gives me a big “wow” – probably because of the strong colours contrasting with the black I first thought this was some modernist artwork, and even after realizing that it is a photo I really like this one. – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- fake support I would like to support this photo, but since I assisted Arion in applying a sharpness filter, I'm not sure if it's morally right for me to participate and endorse the image myself. That being said, some might think the photo is oversaturated, but that's not the case. One thing Arion and I discussed is how vibrant the colors in Brazil are compared to other places. I love this picture --Wilfredor (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support - "weak" only because it looks a little oversaturated compared to other photos of mangosteens I've seen. The pattern/motif is good, though. As an aside, I just tried these for the first time a few months ago. Technically they're illegal to import to the US for agricultural reasons, but you can find people selling them on the street in Chinatown (NYC). For as much as they're heralded as the "king of fruits", I didn't really care for them. I wonder if that's just because they had to be frozen (and probably picked too early) in order to ship them to the US. I know that's the case with durians -- we get underripe frozen ones that rot instead of ripen (hard to tell the difference, though :) ). — Rhododendrites talk | 20:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tsitsikamma National Park (ZA), Kanus an der Küste -- 2024 -- 1990.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 18:46:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 18:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 18:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry, I'm trying to understand this one but failing to do so. The position of the partial-kayaks in the frame ... I don't see anything to balance them. Maybe if they perfectly obscured exactly half of the water, or if there were a few kayaks in the distance on the right side... but they're expected enough objects in such a scene that it just seems unnecessarily cut off? Clearly others see something else, so I'd be curious to hear a full review from some folks. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Euclid’s view of the Horsehead Nebula ESA25170866.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 14:09:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
- Info created by ESA/Euclid/Euclid Consortium/NASA, image processing by J.-C. Cuillandre (CEA Paris-Saclay), G. Anselmi, uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 14:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Resolution and quality is too low for FP in my eyes. Lots of disturbing artifacts are also visible.--Ermell (talk) 21:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Image quality is not there yet. Wolverine XI 06:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
File:001 Olive-bellied Sunbird starting to fly at Kibale National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 00:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Nectariniidae (Sunbirds_and_Spiderhunters)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful bird, cool posture, nice background. – Aristeas (talk) 15:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It has been so over-processed that there is no definition at all on the feathers. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. This is an action shot of a small bird captured at 1/2000s and ISO 4000 was needed since it is a dark forest. The feathers are just as fine as they can get in such conditions, especially with no direct light of the sun. This picture has just as much feather definition than the latest featured pictures of small birds in flight, if not more : 1, 2 3. Giles Laurent (talk) 18:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I’d wish for more definition on the feathers, too, but voters just have decide how is important this is for them. In that recent nomination there is IMHO even less definition on the feathers, but no voter has objected (Wilfredor and me were the only ones to comment on the definition question); that was a bird in flight, yes, but on the other hand it had more light than this one; therefore because that nomination has passed without any objections, we cannot complain much on this one about the missing definition, can we? – Aristeas (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I did mention the overprocessing on the flycatcher FP Aristeas. Those three compositions were all borderline quality, but were more compelling compositions than this one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I remember when I lived in Venezuela, at a time when Caracas was considered the most dangerous city in the world, photographing in those streets was a daily risk, not only because of the expensive equipment, but also for one's life. However, the images I captured often received lukewarm reactions on FPC: “no wow”. This greatly frustrated me, as most other users, located in peaceful European cities filled with splendid architecture, faced no such issues. The lesson I learned over time was that a photograph must be able to speak for itself. It shouldn’t matter if it was raining that day, if it was cloudy or sunny, if the place was dangerous, or if I was sick that day. The quality of my photographic equipment shouldn’t matter either. Circumstantial factors are secondary to the visual message that the image must convey. Photographers are frequently expected to explain or justify our images based on these external circumstances, but in reality, the power of a good photograph lies in its ability to transcend those details and connect with the viewer. It is the viewer’s responsibility to investigate and understand the context if they wish, but as photographers, our duty is to capture and transmit emotions and realities that speak beyond the immediate circumstances Wilfredor (talk) 20:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I’d wish for more definition on the feathers, too, but voters just have decide how is important this is for them. In that recent nomination there is IMHO even less definition on the feathers, but no voter has objected (Wilfredor and me were the only ones to comment on the definition question); that was a bird in flight, yes, but on the other hand it had more light than this one; therefore because that nomination has passed without any objections, we cannot complain much on this one about the missing definition, can we? – Aristeas (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. This is an action shot of a small bird captured at 1/2000s and ISO 4000 was needed since it is a dark forest. The feathers are just as fine as they can get in such conditions, especially with no direct light of the sun. This picture has just as much feather definition than the latest featured pictures of small birds in flight, if not more : 1, 2 3. Giles Laurent (talk) 18:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 21:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Aristeas --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not convinced either, I believe that the lighting conditions were very difficult (bad luck, not the best spot,...who knows) but this quality + composition isn't at FP level to me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 08:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. The thing is that with wildlife you can’t decide the light settings, you have to photograph the animal where it is and adapt yourself to its environment. Moreover it is inevitable to go to high ISO and have more challenging light if you want to photograph a bird beginning to fly. I personally think that I was quite lucky to capture this bird in action and with a pose that let’s us admire its beautiful plumage: it is only with wings wide open that you can see the yellow bellow the bird wings and the bird is perfectly positioned to show it to us. I’ve seen no other photography on the internet showcasing the yellow part of this bird (only drawn illustrations in books) as this bird is usually only photographed in static position with wings closed. Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Berthold Werner (talk) 16:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Riad Salih (talk) 16:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
File:3, Mikhnovskoho Street - Kharkiv.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2024 at 20:23:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
- Info created by Lystopad - uploaded by Lystopad - nominated by Lystopad -- Lystopad (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Lystopad (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, cool architecture and a shame it seems so neglected. Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Lighting, compo (isn't it too tight?) and quality aren't outstanding, the subject, not sure, what are we actually looking at? and how old? there is no information in the description page. Poco a poco (talk) 18:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't get any feedback, so I Oppose for now for the reasons above Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Just added some more details to the description. Lystopad (talk) 15:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't get any feedback, so I Oppose for now for the reasons above Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow --Wilfredor (talk) 20:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too tight crop and no wow factor for me.--Ermell (talk) 21:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others opponents. -- Karelj (talk) 09:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - Generally per poco, but I do like the building and think it would be worth taking another shot at it someday. Maybe with better light and from further away (or a wider-angle lens). — Rhododendrites talk | 20:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:СПб, Петергоф, часовня Иосифа Песнопевца (5).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2024 at 13:08:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info created by ElenaLitera - uploaded by ElenaLitera - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 13:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 13:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very interesting object, unfortunately not sharp enough. --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Rare object & good quality. Sharpness is satisfactory as far as I can see. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not even a QI, lack of wow, definitely no FP, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 17:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough but nothing extraordinary in first place, no "wow" effect Chepry (talk) 07:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Chepry, I'm afraid the rules are you have to provide a reason for an opposing vote for it to be valid, even if the reason is as simple as 'per <other user>'.Cmao20 (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done - thank you! Cmao20 (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Palauenc05. Good quality but unfortunately insufficient sharpness for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Sofia Massif and Sofia Glacier, Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2024 at 12:33:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Snow - Info Sofia Massif (3637) and Sofia Glacier in clouds under fresh autumn snow. This photograph could be considered historic, as the glacier has shrunk significantly in recent decade. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, this photo from 2013 is impressive.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Glaciers look better in the sunshine. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- It shows the entire massif with its geological outline, of which the glacier is only a part of. “Glaciers look better in the sunshine” sounds like a gross overgeneralization. It’s at least doubtful. In fact, dramatic weather conditions better convey their unpredictable and menacing nature. --Argenberg (talk) 17:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've met many glaciers at close quarters. They are predictable and not at all menacing. Google 'glacier' and you will see how sunshine shows a range of blue shades. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, if you just look at a glacier at close quarters, it may not seem menacing. This particular glacier, and many others, are dangerous to cross and walk on, even with proper skills and equipment. I think there’s plethora of visual information in this shot, considering the motif is the massif in its entirety. --Argenberg (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've met many glaciers at close quarters. They are predictable and not at all menacing. Google 'glacier' and you will see how sunshine shows a range of blue shades. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, safety first, please. I also agree with Argenberg that glaciers can look better in unpredictable conditions. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The prominent mountainous rock in the middle creates a feeling of being on another planet --Wilfredor (talk) 20:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have the same feelings as you. The landscape looks alien to me too, like a scene from another planet. In addition to the big tower rock, smaller upcrusts and outcrops on the right, fragmented snow, atmospheric mist and overcast sky add to the impression. This is the bed of an ancient glacier that contracted with global warming, but will regain in the next global cooling phase. Here is a closer look at the wall of the glacier bed: File:Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains, Софийские ледники и водопады, Карачаево-Черкесия.jpg The waterfalls at the terminus are 120 m high, and the tower rock you mentioned is also huge, its prominence is probably around 300 m. This whole giant glacier floor will one day be covered with moving ice again, potentially spilling ice into the valley below. It will then look more earthly than today. Now it’s unearthly. --Argenberg (talk) 18:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:North African Thekla's lark (Galerida theklae carolinae) Gabes.jpg, featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2024 at 08:47:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)
- Info The subspecies that lives on the edge of the Sahara desert. No FPs of the species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality + composition excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 00:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
OpposeGreat light and composition, which I think deserve better processing: Topaz has left masking halos around the bird and rock; and false detail in the feathers, particularly around the eye. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks. New version uploaded Julesvernex2. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Better, thanks. Contrast is much lower though, was that intentional? Personally I would place it somewhere between the two versions. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done You do realise that you are now in a (distant) second place in the Commons Pernickety Editor Trophy 2024. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm gunning for the top spot :) Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done You do realise that you are now in a (distant) second place in the Commons Pernickety Editor Trophy 2024. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the improvements and thanks to Julesvernex2 for the constructive hints. – Aristeas (talk) 14:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 13:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 20:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The bird image reveals several issues that likely stem from digital processing, particularly noise reduction. A subtle shaded edge is noticeable on the bird's belly, leading me to believe this is an adverse effect of noise reduction, where the program fails to distinguish between noise and the bird's feathers, creating this edge. Another issue is observed in the bird's eye, which appears textureless, giving it a lifeless look, as if the bird were taxidermied. I would strongly recommend not removing so much noise. While noise can be acceptable and even natural in certain contexts, such as the inherent grain from sensors, in other instances it should be avoided, especially when it results from artificial over-sharpening. Another concern I have is the rock at the bottom of the image, which shows completely white, textureless areas, likely due to excessive reflections. It would be beneficial to see if reducing the brightness on the rock could reveal these textures and thus recover details in these areas. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I fail to see what you're expressing. And why make the comment so long? Why not summarize the key points? Wolverine XI 06:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- There is no limitation for comments, it is long because I think it is a way to honor the author, to explain as best as possible what I intend to decide because English is not my mother tongue. Also because Charles has been doing a lot of good reviews of other photos and deserves a good review too, he has done a lot of previous evaluations but today is an opportunity to return the favor. Some people see negative votes as something bad, but in the case of Charles and yo, they are the votes that we most appreciate because if they are well argued, they help us improve. Wilfredor (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I fail to see what you're expressing. And why make the comment so long? Why not summarize the key points? Wolverine XI 06:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. El Golli Mohamed 00:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Revenge vote noted; see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flamants à Thyna (Sfax).jpg/2 Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think you may be right. Wolverine XI 06:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think so. He's opposing all my images at QIC now. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Revenge vote noted; see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flamants à Thyna (Sfax).jpg/2 Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good compo and quality. Wolverine XI 06:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support With some hesitation about the tail feathers out of focus. But overall impression is very good. --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)