Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2014/11

Collegiate Church in Tum edit

View opposition
Nominated by: Albertus teolog (talk) on 2009-09-21 13:16 (UTC)
Scope: Collegiate church in Tum, exterior
Used in: pl:Kolegiata w Tumie
Support Ok IMO --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)`[reply] Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 => File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted --Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Chrumps (talk) on 2014-10-26 13:36 (UTC)
Scope: Saint Mary and Saint Alexius collegiate church in Tum view from SW
Reason: Cultural heritage monument in Poland -- Chrumps (talk)
Comment : could you, please, add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope, as we usually do on this page ? --JLPC (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support Fine like this too. A scope too narrow does not make sense. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] Comment Of course there is a sense for adding a direction, because this church (and other churches and most of the buildings) looks completely different from other side. Yann, We discussed abot this few times here in VI... --Halavar (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] Done --Chrumps (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)`[reply] Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support This is better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support Really, this is better. — revi_msg 14:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) 2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 <-- => File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted<-- --Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Léon Blum, 1927 edit

View opposition
Nominated by: Yann (talk) on 2013-12-24 16:58 (UTC)
Scope: Léon Blum
Info Yes, I know there are still some lines and scratches, but you need to see where I started. Yann (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply] Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)`[reply] Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 => File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. --Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-12 15:39 (UTC)
Scope: Léon Blum, 1927, photograph
Reason: This picture, shot in 1927 by an unknown photographer of Agence Meurisse, is the best in scope imo. Stiched, restored (all scratches suppressed) and cropped at home : no geocode. --JLPC (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC) -- JLPC (talk)[reply]
Comment There is already a VI for this scope: File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg, but your version is probably better. Could you create a MVR? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply] Done Support Very similar images, but this one is little bit better:) --Halavar (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support --P e z i (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support Yours is better. ;oD Yann (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) 2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 <-- => File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. <-- --Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)