Reason:
The ongoing discussion at FPC made clear that this alternative (which is also likely to be promoted to FP has been promoted to FP) is the superior and thus also more valuable image. -- Martin Falbisoner (talk)
Oppose I disagree. Technical quality at 100% zoom is certainly better, but that does not matter at the 480px review size. I don't see what would make this one better from a VI point of view. The fur at the back looks unusually messy as if s/he's just come out of a fight. The paws are not visible in this one. --El Grafo (talk) 07:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]