Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2019/03

View promotion
Nominated by: Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-06-28 08:34 (UTC)
Scope: Façade portal of Saint-Martin, Colmar, France
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)`[reply] Support better framing. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support - Not only that, the color looks real and not washed out. I think this is flat-out better, at least at the sizes shown on the file pages. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Colmar saint martin portail.jpg: 2 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Portail de la collégiale Saint-Martin (Colmar).jpg: -1 => File:Colmar saint martin portail.jpg: Remains as a VI. <-- File:Portail de la collégiale Saint-Martin (Colmar).jpg: Declined. ---- DeFacto (talk). 18:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Gzen92 ^[discuter] on 2019-02-19 14:08 (UTC)
Scope: *Facade portal of Saint-Martin, Colmar*
Comment there is already a promoted image for this scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] ~~Support~~ sharper. Charles (talk) 11:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Oppose per my remarks on the existing VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Colmar saint martin portail.jpg: 2 (current VI within same scope) 2. Portail de la collégiale Saint-Martin (Colmar).jpg: -1 <-- => File:Colmar saint martin portail.jpg: Remains as a VI. File:Portail de la collégiale Saint-Martin (Colmar).jpg: Declined. <-- ---- DeFacto (talk). 18:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)