Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2019/05

Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park edit

View opposition
Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2019-05-02 20:15 (UTC)
Scope: Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park
Reason: Please demote in favour of the other image. I wasn't expecting to get back there so soon, but the newer version has no car obscuring the view. -- Rodhullandemu (talk)
Comment - File:Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park 2019-3.jpg looks to me like the most useful photo of the lodge, followed by File:Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park 2019-2.jpg. Why do you think this one is best in scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply] @Ikan Kekek: The others only show the upper storey and despite the car, this shows both. Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:15, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support - True. Best in scope, therefore. I take it, there's no way to get the complete building in one shot, because of vegetation in the way? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:49, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply] It's a small plot anyway, and you are right about the trees, etc. Apart from the car, this is probably the best view achievable without a drone. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:11, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 7 May 2019 (UTC)`[reply] Oppose - Now oppose in favor of the other nominee. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:58, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply] Oppose In favor of the other nominee--BoothSift 06:02, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park 2019-1a.jpg: +3 2. Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park 2019-1.jpg: -2 (current VI within same scope) <-- => File:Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park 2019-1.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park 2019-1a.jpg: Promoted. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2019-05-12 16:33 (UTC)
Scope: Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park
Used in: en:Listed buildings in Birkenhead Park
Reason: Better view -- Rodhullandemu (talk)
Support - Yes, slightly better, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:58, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support I agree. Yann (talk) 03:04, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support Better--BoothSift 06:02, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park 2019-1a.jpg: +3 2. Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park 2019-1.jpg: -2 (current VI within same scope) <-- => File:Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park 2019-1.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Central Lodge, Birkenhead Park 2019-1a.jpg: Promoted. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:55, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Logo of FM Santa María de las Misiones edit

View promotion
Nominated by: Ezarateesteban on 2019-05-02 23:23 (UTC)
Scope: Logo of FM Santa María de las Misiones
Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 7 May 2019 (UTC)`[reply] 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/FM Santa María de las Misiones.svg:+1<-- 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/LOGO-RADIO-1.png: 0 => 1. File: FM Santa María de las Misiones.svg: Promoted <-- 2. File: LOGO-RADIO-1.png: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Logo de Santa María de las Misiones 89.3 FM.png