Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2020/04

Beijing National Aquatics Centre (icerink) edit

View opposition
Nominated by: Arne (talk) on 2019-12-22 18:49 (UTC)
Scope: Interior of Beijing National Aquatics Centre (icerink)
Comment - Malformed scopes for both files: "Category" shouldn't be visible in any VI scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Comment - fixed --Arne (talk) 09:17, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] 1. Water Cube Ice Cube Beijing 1.jpg: 0 <-- 2. Water Cube Ice Cube Beijing 2.jpg: +1 => 1. File:Water Cube Ice Cube Beijing 1.jpg : Declined <-- 2. File:Water Cube Ice Cube Beijing 2.jpg : Promoted pandakekok9 12:16, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Arne (talk) on 2019-12-22 18:49 (UTC)
Scope: Interior of Beijing National Aquatics Centre (icerink)
Support better Charles (talk) 21:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Water Cube Ice Cube Beijing 1.jpg: 0 2. Water Cube Ice Cube Beijing 2.jpg: +1 <-- => 1. File:Water Cube Ice Cube Beijing 1.jpg : Declined 2. File:Water Cube Ice Cube Beijing 2.jpg : Promoted <-- pandakekok9 12:16, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Retable de Bergheim edit

View promotion
Nominated by: Gzen92 ^[discuter] on 2020-02-28 11:39 (UTC)
Scope: Retable de Bergheim
Support - Sides open further, clearer depiction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Musée Unterlinden - retable de Bergheim (~1510) (1).jpg: +1 <-- 2. Bergheimer Altar (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01203.jpg: -1 => 1. File:Musée Unterlinden - retable de Bergheim (~1510) (1).jpg : Promoted. <-- 2. File:Bergheimer Altar (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01203.jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. --pandakekok9 12:22, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Gzen92 ^[discuter] on 2017-12-27 17:30 (UTC)
Scope: *Retable de Bergheim : Veit Wagner, Retable de Bergheim* (~1515)**
Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 1 January 2018 (UTC)`[reply] Oppose - Depiction not as clear, per my comments on the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:37, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Musée Unterlinden - retable de Bergheim (~1510) (1).jpg: +1 2. Bergheimer Altar (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01203.jpg: -1 <-- => 1. File:Musée Unterlinden - retable de Bergheim (~1510) (1).jpg : Promoted. 2. File:Bergheimer Altar (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01203.jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- --pandakekok9 12:22, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

The Chariot of Death edit

View promotion
Nominated by: Gzen92 ^[discuter] on 2020-02-28 11:39 (UTC)
Scope: The Chariot of Death
Support - Lacks glare, so seems better. I hope it's not too dark. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply] Best in Scope due to lack of glare. Buidhe (talk) 02:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] Support Lacks glare as Ikan Kekek said, and it's also better without the frame. --pandakekok9 11:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Musée Unterlinden - Théophile Schuler - Le Char de la Mort (1848) (2).jpg: +3 <-- 2. Colmar (9621828529).jpg: -2 => 1. File:Musée Unterlinden - Théophile Schuler - Le Char de la Mort (1848) (2).jpg : Promoted. <-- 2. File:Colmar (9621828529).jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. --pandakekok9 12:31, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Gzen92 ^[discuter] on 2018-01-01 11:12 (UTC)
Scope: *The Chariot of Death : Théophile Schuler, Le char de la mort* (1848)**
Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)`[reply] Oppose for glare. See comment on the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply] Oppose per Ikan Kekek. --pandakekok9 11:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Musée Unterlinden - Théophile Schuler - Le Char de la Mort (1848) (2).jpg: +3 2. Colmar (9621828529).jpg: -2 <-- => 1. File:Musée Unterlinden - Théophile Schuler - Le Char de la Mort (1848) (2).jpg : Promoted. 2. File:Colmar (9621828529).jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- --pandakekok9 12:31, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Coenobita clypeatus edit

View opposition
Nominated by: Domob (talk) on 2019-12-08 11:33 (UTC)
Scope: Coenobita clypeatus (Caribbean hermit crab)
Reason: Good and high resolution image, could replace the existing main picture -- Domob (talk)
Oppose - Better quality but not as useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] 1. Hermite Crab Dry Tortugas.jpg: -1 <-- 2. Caribbean hermit crab.JPG: +3 => 1. File:Hermite Crab Dry Tortugas.jpg : Declined. <-- 2. File:Caribbean hermit crab.JPG : Promoted. --pandakekok9 12:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Domob (talk) on 2019-12-08 11:36 (UTC)
Scope: Coenobita clypeatus (Caribbean hermit crab)
Reason: Currently the mainly used image for Coenobita clypeatus -- Domob (talk)
Comment I think this one has lower overall quality. --Domob (talk) 11:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support more valuable. Charles (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support per Charles. More valuable because it shows more of the crab's body. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:06, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support I would support the other photo in terms of quality, since this one has a too bright shell. But I would have to agree with nom, Charles, and Ikan Kekek here. It's more important to show as much as possible the body of the species. --pandakekok9 11:13, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Hermite Crab Dry Tortugas.jpg: -1 2. Caribbean hermit crab.JPG: +3 <-- => 1. File:Hermite Crab Dry Tortugas.jpg : Declined. 2. File:Caribbean hermit crab.JPG : Promoted. <-- --pandakekok9 12:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Reagan assassination attempt, immediately before being shot edit

View
Nominated by: pandakekok9 on 2020-03-31 05:27 (UTC)
Scope: Reagan assassination attempt, immediately before being shot
Info This version is File:Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... - NARA - 198513.tif (which is also nominated here) without the white border. pandakekok9 05:33, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... (white border removed).png: 0 <-- 2. Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... - NARA - 198513.tif: 0 3. President Ronald Reagan moments before he was shot in an assassination attempt 1981.jpg: 0 => 1. File:Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... (white border removed).png : Undecided. <-- 2. File:Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... - NARA - 198513.tif : Undecided. 3. File:President Ronald Reagan moments before he was shot in an assassination attempt 1981.jpg : Undecided. --pandakekok9 12:55, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by: pandakekok9 on 2020-03-31 05:28 (UTC)
Scope: Reagan assassination attempt, immediately before being shot
Info This is the original version from NARA, with the white border. pandakekok9 05:33, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... (white border removed).png: 0 2. Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... - NARA - 198513.tif: 0 <-- 3. President Ronald Reagan moments before he was shot in an assassination attempt 1981.jpg: 0 => 1. File:Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... (white border removed).png : Undecided. 2. File:Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... - NARA - 198513.tif : Undecided. <-- 3. File:President Ronald Reagan moments before he was shot in an assassination attempt 1981.jpg : Undecided. --pandakekok9 12:54, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by: pandakekok9 on 2020-03-31 05:29 (UTC)
Scope: Reagan assassination attempt, immediately before being shot
Info This version is different from File:Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... (white border removed).png and File:Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... - NARA - 198513.tif (both are also nominated). This seems to be taken from a different source, and it's brighter than both nominations. pandakekok9 05:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... (white border removed).png: 0 2. Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... - NARA - 198513.tif: 0 3. President Ronald Reagan moments before he was shot in an assassination attempt 1981.jpg: 0 <-- => 1. File:Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... (white border removed).png : Undecided. 2. File:Photograph of President Reagan waving to crowds immediately before being shot in an assassination attempt, Washington... - NARA - 198513.tif : Undecided. 3. File:President Ronald Reagan moments before he was shot in an assassination attempt 1981.jpg : Undecided. <-- --pandakekok9 12:54, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

pied barbet edit

View opposition
Nominated by: B.p. on 2013-02-16 16:25 (UTC)
Scope: Tricholaema leucomelas (Pied barbet)
Reason: Only photograph on Commons -- B.p.
Support VI. --JLPC (talk) 11:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:20, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply] Oppose. The other image is higher quality. Buidhe (talk) 21:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] Oppose Not the best representation, as there are other images of higher quality in the same scope. --pandakekok9 11:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Tricholaema leucomelas.jpg: -2 <-- 2. Acacia pied barbet (Tricholaema leucomelas centralis).jpg: +2 3. Acacia pied barbet-1209 - Flickr - Ragnhild & Neil Crawford.jpg: 0 => 1. File:Tricholaema leucomelas.jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- 2. File:Acacia pied barbet (Tricholaema leucomelas centralis).jpg : Promoted. 3. File:Acacia pied barbet-1209 - Flickr - Ragnhild & Neil Crawford.jpg : Declined. --pandakekok9 13:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2020-03-16 12:32 (UTC)
Scope: Tricholaema leucomelas centralis (Acacia pied barbet)
Comment There is a problem with Tricholaema leucomelas.jpg both images show the same subspecies. The first image is already VI. You have to go through Pending Most valued review candidates. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] Done thanks. Didn't show on my PC. Charles (talk) 14:26, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] Best in Scope Buidhe (talk) 21:03, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Tricholaema leucomelas.jpg: -2 2. Acacia pied barbet (Tricholaema leucomelas centralis).jpg: +2 <-- 3. Acacia pied barbet-1209 - Flickr - Ragnhild & Neil Crawford.jpg: 0 => 1. File:Tricholaema leucomelas.jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. 2. File:Acacia pied barbet (Tricholaema leucomelas centralis).jpg : Promoted. <-- 3. File:Acacia pied barbet-1209 - Flickr - Ragnhild & Neil Crawford.jpg : Declined. --pandakekok9 13:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: pandakekok9 on 2020-03-29 11:05 (UTC)
Scope: Tricholaema leucomelas centralis (Acacia pied barbet)
Reason: I think this image best represent the Acacia pied barbet compared to the two. It passes all VI criteria I think. -- pandakekok9
Placeholder comment. pandakekok9 13:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Tricholaema leucomelas.jpg: -2 2. Acacia pied barbet (Tricholaema leucomelas centralis).jpg: +2 3. Acacia pied barbet-1209 - Flickr - Ragnhild & Neil Crawford.jpg: 0 <-- => 1. File:Tricholaema leucomelas.jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. 2. File:Acacia pied barbet (Tricholaema leucomelas centralis).jpg : Promoted. 3. File:Acacia pied barbet-1209 - Flickr - Ragnhild & Neil Crawford.jpg : Declined. <-- --pandakekok9 13:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Dan Panosian edit

View opposition
Nominated by: Jaqen (talk) on 2020-04-04 07:10 (UTC)
Scope: Dan Panosian
Used in: en:Dan Panosian, fr:Dan Panosian, d:Q16934960
Reason: Best in scope imho. -- Jaqen (talk)
Question How do you compare your nomination to this? pandakekok9 02:10, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] @Pandakekok9: I proposed this one because it is more used, but in fact the one you are linking might be better. It's fine for me to candidate the other one if this proposal is rejected. --Jaqen (talk) 07:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] @Jaqen: After some pondering, I will open a MVR. The reason I hesitated at first is because it might just stall without someone participating. Now someone initiated a new MVR, so I guess there's hope this time. pandakekok9 05:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Dan Panosian - Lucca Comics & Games 2018 02.jpg 0 <-- 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Dan Panosian - Lucca Comics & Games 2018 03.jpg +2 => 1. File:Dan Panosian - Lucca Comics & Games 2018 02.jpg : Declined. <-- 2. File:Dan Panosian - Lucca Comics & Games 2018 03.jpg : Promoted. --pandakekok9 03:52, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: pandakekok9 on 2020-04-09 05:21 (UTC)
Scope: Dan Panosian
Reason: Better as the subject has a larger part in the image, and faces more closely to the camera. -- pandakekok9
Support This one's IMO better as the subject is looking to the camera. --T.Bednarz (talk) 19:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Support Subject is better-engaged with the viewer. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Dan Panosian - Lucca Comics & Games 2018 02.jpg 0 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Dan Panosian - Lucca Comics & Games 2018 03.jpg +2 <-- => 1. File:Dan Panosian - Lucca Comics & Games 2018 02.jpg : Declined. 2. File:Dan Panosian - Lucca Comics & Games 2018 03.jpg : Promoted. <-- --pandakekok9 03:51, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

St James' Church, Birkenhead 2020 edit

View opposition
Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2020-04-02 16:40 (UTC)
Scope: St James' Church, Birkenhead
Used in: Wikidata:Q15979367
Comment top of cross is cropped. Charles (talk) 11:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment That's why it's not nominated as a QI. But it's unlikely I will (ever) be able to return there for a better shot. If someone comes up with a better one, I'm happy with that. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment I think St James' Church, Birkenhead 2020-2.jpg is more valuable. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:55, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Oppose per Kestreltail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/St James' Church, Birkenhead 2020-3.jpg -1 <-- 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/St James' Church, Birkenhead 2020-2.jpg +2 => 1. File:St James' Church, Birkenhead 2020-3.jpg : Declined. <-- 2. File:St James' Church, Birkenhead 2020-2.jpg : Promoted. --pandakekok9 09:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2020-04-12 17:09 (UTC)
Scope: St James' Church, Birkenhead
Support - More valuable, as we see more of the church. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Support Per Ikan. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/St James' Church, Birkenhead 2020-3.jpg -1 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/St James' Church, Birkenhead 2020-2.jpg +2 <-- => 1. File:St James' Church, Birkenhead 2020-3.jpg : Declined. 2. File:St James' Church, Birkenhead 2020-2.jpg : Promoted. <-- --pandakekok9 09:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)