Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Новоспасский монастырь и церковь Сорока мучеников Севастийских.jpg

File:Новоспасский монастырь и церковь Сорока мучеников Севастийских.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2013 at 12:24:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created + uploaded by Святослав - nominated by me --A.Savin 12:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Despite some minor technical weaknesses I find that this picture has lots of wow anyway. --A.Savin 12:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:08, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 13:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! --Arcalino (talk) 14:25, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:03, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great combination of wow and EV. J Kadavoor J e e 16:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality, nice composition and light. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Request Savin, it will be very helpful if you (or anybody else) add an English description while nominating so that we can understand the subject better. Google Translator helps me in most cases; but not always. And sometimes even categories are in foreign languages to me. Hope I picked well, this time. J Kadavoor J e e 05:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Savin, but I've done it for him. --A.Savin 09:46, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I din't get (I'm not Savin)? I think I requested to the nominator; not to the contributor. Thanks, anyway. J Kadavoor J e e 10:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the nominator's username is A.Savin. The nominator doesn't like to be adressed just by his surname (in Europe it appears impolite). He may be adressed by his first name either. --A.Savin 10:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm; I hope people will select better admins next time. :( J Kadavoor J e e 13:08, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support like it --Michael Kramer (talk) 09:40, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the composition but I am not convinced about the result. There are too many flares, the light sources are too intense, the crop inthe bottom is improvable and IMHO the exposure time was a tick too long. Poco a poco (talk) 16:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry! Composition and quality are sufficient in my opinion. First of all, by looking at the picture I think the main subjects are the tower buildings. That's because how they are composed, and it's good that way! However, the bright light bulbs cause too much distraction for my taste. Of course the prominent light sources can't be removed from their places but they are quite much competing for attention which I think is unoptimal for the subject. --Ximonic (talk) 12:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /The High Fin Sperm Whale 06:09, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture