Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:تاقبستان.jpg
File:تاقبستان.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2021 at 10:44:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Iran
Info created by AliHeidari2 - uploaded by AliHeidari2 - nominated by POS78 -- POS78 (talk) 10:44, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Support -- POS78 (talk) 10:44, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose can't support due to lack of clarity of composition. This image would have been better taken at a different time without the shadow covering part of the door. I would also prefer a more direct angle, more like this. Buidhe (talk) 16:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)- Oppose Per above RolfHill (talk) 11:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Maybe if it were just the archways, the trees and the reflections. As it is it asks us to take in a lot. Daniel Case (talk) 01:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment For me personally this is an instructive photo, so thank you for pointing it out. There is definitely an FP in the scenery, but this photo has not revealed it; and I have spent some time thinking about the lessons this photo teaches me. The most important point has been stated by Daniel: to limit the composition to the most photogenic items, namely trees, archways, and reflections; and it would probably be necessary to include the whole reflections of the trees (instead of the upper part of the rocks). From the point of view of a historian or archeologist, the relief and the little arch at the right are important, but for a photographer the trees and the reflections are more important because together with the two big archways they form a solid, photogenic composition. In addition, sharpness and level of details are not perfect (a better lens and f/5.6 or f/8 would have helped). The brightness, gradation, and colour balance are unlucky, too, but these points could probably be fixed completely if we had access to a raw image file. --Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:07, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
