Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20080406165033!V-22 Osprey refueling edit1.jpg

File:20080406165033!V-22 Osprey refueling edit1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2010 at 01:23:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by the US army - uploaded by Mfield - nominated by The High Fin Sperm Whale -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:23, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:23, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aqwis (talk) 08:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - No explanation of anything (what are the green rings in the air? what are the red and blue-green glows?), and also people are blurred. - MPF (talk) 10:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cesco77 (talk) 12:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Image quality and composition (with the blurred foreground) not the best. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow you two are a piece of work. Blurred people on a long exposure shot ? How strange !! - BTW this effect is commonly used in night shots, to contrast with the immobility of the scene, as here. Nice composition : good framing & some lead-in is present, the blurred foreground adds depth to the image. It could be cropped, though I prefer it there (also dimensions make it suitable for desktop wallpaper). Quality is good for a night shot. -- ianaré (talk) 22:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the blurred people are an issue (they could have been asked to hold steady for the photo!), but the lack of information is much more why I opposed. The info won't be easily available either, as the photographer isn't a Commons contributor who can be asked for more detail - MPF (talk) 20:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like it, but I think it needs an explication about the blue and red glows and why there are some green rings. --Llorenzi (talk) 08:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting. The green rings are lights on the ends of the propeller blades, time-lapsed. Jujutacular ^T · C 14:22, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Persons aren't sharp, but other is OK to me. --Mile (talk) 15:42, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karel (talk) 14:01, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now. The description given is simply inadequate. There has been inconclusive speculation about what we're seeing on the image's talk page for more than a year. I agree with Ianare about the blurred people and foreground, and the good general image quality. I would support if a convincing description of the interesting lighting effects was given. --Avenue (talk) 09:47, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Von.grzanka (talk) 20:51, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support--M Zaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 20:48, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles