Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013 02 Foz do Iguacu 248.jpg

File:2013 02 Foz do Iguacu 248.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2015 at 10:34:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural or Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
Info Iguazu Falls, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Sergio Alexandre Korndorfer - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me very special --LivioAndronico talk 11:29, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support You shouldn't go chasing waterfalls, but if you get results like this no one should mind. An excellent example of when you shouldn't use a long bridal-veil exposure to make a great image of a torrential cataract like this. I can almost hear it roar. Daniel Case (talk) 16:07, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Daniel Case: Look at the "water smoke" going up. I'm almost feeling the water drops touching my arm. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work, nice place. Yann (talk) 21:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality is not the best but very dramatic image. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King of Hearts but composition-wise and lighting-wise, not remarkable light, too tight crop, I don't find the composition works. ~~almost same as this opposes (about composition and light).~~ --Laitche (talk) 22:23, 16 May 2015 (UTC) That was bad way to vote. --Laitche (talk) 17:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Laitche: Why "That was bad way to vote"? You can argue when to oppose. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:28, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - @ArionEstar: I should vote with my own words, only a link is not good way :) --Laitche (talk) 18:36, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Laitche and too tight and random crop/composition. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:42, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 09:19, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Lauro Sirgado^contribs 18:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. There are a lot of way better waterfalls shots. -- Pofka (talk) 18:41, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Like sunsets, large waterfalls are attractive, but this one isn't a great image. Composition issues and a bit under-exposed. -- Colin (talk) 19:26, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others, comparing this one to other waterfall FPs I don't thing that it is the same league. The crop and composition is not convincing, e.g. the bottom left (or generall the bottom crop) is disturbing and the cropped waterfall on the right is also unfortunate. Poc o² 08:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination @Laitche, Alchemist-hp, Pofka, Colin, and Poco a poco: Thanks for all comments. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:00, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]