Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Wieża widokowa na Borówkowej 07.jpg
File:2015 Wieża widokowa na Borówkowej 07.jpg edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2015 at 16:37:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment We already have File:2015 Wieża widokowa na Borówkowej 01.jpg featured and this is the same tower photographed a few minutes before, and a few steps to the right. They're almost mirror-images. Which one is the "finest"? -- Colin (talk) 19:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- This is not a mirror image, but the image captured from the other side, compare descriptions of images. Since the VI can nominate photographs of the same object from different directions, I thought that the FP can be. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't say they were mirror images. You took and uploaded seven images within a few minutes of each other of the same subject in the same light. Are you going to nominate them all at FP? Most of us take photographs from different angles, different aspects, in the same photo shoot, but then decide which is the best. A cathedral or castle may merit photographs from all sides at FP, but a round tower? -- Colin (talk) 20:31, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- One by one: I did six pictures and nominated two in my opinion the best, made from different directions. Photos were quickly because it was cold and I do not understand why it matters. The tower is round, but no shelter. More images of this series I'm not going to nominate, because it would not make sense. I'm not a Soviet general decorate medals to the FP, but I think that the photos that were nominated deserve these awards. If you are not allowed to nominate two images of the same object taken from different angles at any time I can withdraw the nomination. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:22, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't say they were mirror images. You took and uploaded seven images within a few minutes of each other of the same subject in the same light. Are you going to nominate them all at FP? Most of us take photographs from different angles, different aspects, in the same photo shoot, but then decide which is the best. A cathedral or castle may merit photographs from all sides at FP, but a round tower? -- Colin (talk) 20:31, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- This is not a mirror image, but the image captured from the other side, compare descriptions of images. Since the VI can nominate photographs of the same object from different directions, I thought that the FP can be. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose It does look like a mirror version of the other FP. Not enough better or worse (or even just "different") to justify another star to me. - Benh (talk) 22:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
