Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016-02-23 15-51-41 paris.jpg

File:2016-02-23 15-51-41 paris.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2016 at 09:13:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 09:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 09:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Question - Do you mean to nominate these two photos as a series? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I nominate only images individually. --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think it's better to do that, actually. I'm going to respectfully Oppose both these photos. These tympana are wonderful, but I prefer the work of Dietmar Rabich in this instance, except for its lack of perspective correction, because its contrast puts the carvings into much sharper relief. In comparison, your photos make these tympana look bland to me. No offense, and much respect for the quality photos you took, but I don't think they're really feature-worthy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI but not FP. As Ikan notes, the lighting isn't special and I don't find the bottom crop to be ideal. (the image has no embedded colourspace and the filename is unhelpful). -- Colin (talk) 22:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral as these two images are very similar and I think we should decide to consider one or the other but not both. Daniel Case (talk) 23:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Very similar ? Are you serious ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes ... they're both nestled stone arches. I really think they should have been nominated together, or not at all. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, they are very different and tell very different stories... And nominating the two as a set is a non sense : there are three existing portals, one is missing.--Jebulon (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Colin. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:43, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 15:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]