Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20180819 ReuttenerSeilbahn vorZugspitze blau DSC00935 PtrQs.jpg

File:20180819 ReuttenerSeilbahn vorZugspitze blau DSC00935 PtrQs.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 12:50:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Cableways
Info created & uploaded by PtrQs - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice minimalistic composition. -- Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mimihitam (talk) 14:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing spectacular here. Seven Pandas (talk) 14:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality but I incline to agree with Seven Pandas. It's all a bit empty for me, there's not much tension in the composition. Cmao20 (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Subject in the shadow -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment As this picture is generated from a raw file there is almost no limit to highlighting, but a) the gondola is coated by tinted glass, and b) artificially minimizing the constrast would mean to destroy the monochromatic blueish look by flashy red colors. --PtrQs (talk) 23:44, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying you can save this nomination with a better post-processing, unfortunately, this gondola is very dark and thus uninteresting in my view (like this one) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --XRay ^talk 11:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 03:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the overall effect very much. I don't think it's a problem that the gondola is darker than the background -- which is the real subject. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 04:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support love the overall effect, gondola is not the object here, but the background with its lovely shades of blue. Renata3 (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The odd position and lighting on the gondola may have been intentional, but it doesn't work fo me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:08, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing stands out to warrant FP. -- Alsakan (talk) 18:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I could see this working as a horizontal ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This composition just does not work on a computer screen. I really dislike it especially in full screen mode. But looking at the thumb on the nomination page made me realize: It needs to be printed large, hung on an otherwise empty white wall and looked at from a distance of at least 3 meters. Perfect for waiting rooms or for relaxing your eyes in the office. Stare at it and get lost in your thoughts. The gondola could be a plain black silhouette and it wouldn't matter. It is not what you're looking at, it's only there to provide an additional layer of depth – and because of that it is positioned exactly where it needs to be. --El Grafo (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Grafo's idea finally convinced me. --T.Bednarz (talk) 10:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support how to take great shot in the day of bad atmospheric conditions. --Grtek (talk) 10:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:00, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I was going to oppose, but I looked at the full-page image from about 1.5 and then 1.7 or so meters, and I see more depth in it from there. I think I'll abstain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support no surprise - I like it. --PtrQs (talk) 10:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have to say, what a dramatic vote and ending haha. Tomer T (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Tomer T: Thank you for your nomination and support. I believe it was so tight because it seperates those, who see what's in the pure original picture from those, who see, what's in the picture they see in their mind. And thanks to all the others for revealing their opinion and resulting evaluation - especially @El Grafo: . --PtrQs (talk) 21:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Cableways