Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-04.jpg

File:ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-04.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2017 at 08:57:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
Info The main office complex of the ADAC in Munich was designed by Sauerbruch Hutton and opened in 2012. All by me, -Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support That is so cool! Though I must admit that I read the heading too fast and wondered why AC/DC had a headquarter in Munich... --cart-Talk 09:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! Well Cart, as the ADAC is vehemently opposed to speed limits on Autobahns, Highway to Hell could serve as an inofficial anthem for them --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like the framing and how you handled the colors. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yeah, interesting. --A.Savin 12:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 15:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good! ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 17:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support However, could you improve on the colour noise reduction? -- Colin (talk) 17:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but per Colin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daphne Lantier 20:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support but per Colin, the color noise (particularly evident on the black areas of the building) needs to be reduced. Daniel Case (talk) 01:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:05, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Info I've reduced color noise as requested. The picture's much better now, thanks for the hint! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:50, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:11, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I like the other version without the tree even more. --Code (talk) 13:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- yes, the #### tree... it's not that it wasn't there in the other version as well... at least until Photoshop did its ugly business... ;) The reason why I like this version better, tree or not, is that it appears a bit more balanced, with the framing being less intrusive on the composition. The tower's relative position also works better imo. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --DXR (talk) 10:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Germany