Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7925.jpg

File:Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7925.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2016 at 14:19:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Windows
Info created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 14:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 14:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice texture and abstract forms. Daniel Case (talk) 16:08, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual, good quality. Yann (talk) 18:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support − Meiræ 20:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't get this. Charles (talk) 22:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support lNeverCry 02:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like one of the minimalist photos from Western countries that we often see here, but with an Nepali twist. The imperfections (compared to glass-and-steel skyscrapers) add to this picture in my opinion, so it works for me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:14, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @King of Hearts: --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 09:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ Wish to see all train. Such crop isnt interesting. P.S. I would still like all train --Mile (talk) 08:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@PetarM: Hi Mile, Its only one railway station in Nepal. Right now New Track is in under construction.. In station some abandoned train and bogies are there -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 09:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

talk if you have all, similar, put as alternative version. --Mile (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I really like this take on decaying surfaces, rust and all. However, I suspect that the colors were much more vibrant IRL and that the pic suffers from the washout that many times occurs when you photograph painted surfaces in strong light due to the paint's reflective properties. This can of course be fixed in post processing. Thoughts? cart-Talk 11:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review @W.carter: and @PetarM: . and . and Cart you are right,i push the vibrance to +26 and saturation to +5 really it look much better than rest one. Now we discuss which one is better..Plz suggest me, Thanks -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To my eyes that small addition of saturation looks much better, using the rusty details as guideline. This one looks best. There are some other thing that could be done with it, but those are just minor tweaks and a bit difficult to describe here. Hopefully you will get some more comments about this. Even though good light is essential for good photos, very strong sunlight can sometimes be a problem on some surfaces. cart-Talk 17:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that that version is best. I'm still not feeling it as an FP, though. This is a well-composed photo, but it's not wowing me, so I guess I should vote to Oppose a feature, although I feel a bit apologetic doing so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support The image is well composed and fulfilling the FP image guideline. --Biplab Anand (Talk) 02:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo gives me the feeling I am standing just before the train. I prefer this version because the blue coloured window looks much more natural for me. Good composition, skylight through the train is well done. --Michielverbeek (talk) 13:46, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

Info @Daniel Case: @Yann: @Meiræ: @Charlesjsharp: @INeverCry: @King of Hearts: @PetarM: @बिप्लब आनन्द: @Ikan Kekek: @W.carter: plz take a look --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 02:38, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose I prefer the original above. Great textures and natural light. This looks a bit over-saturated to me. lNeverCry 08:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@INeverCry: Thanks for your review. I think in amoled screen this looks bit over saturated. When i show ur comment then i check this in my mobile phone and i found that bit saturated but in laptop same file is ok. In light room i push saturation to +10 becoz when i reduce shadow and hightlight then it look bit unsaturated.. -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 06:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see one of these versions pass, so I'll switch to a mild Support for this version. lNeverCry 06:40, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support --cart-Talk 09:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per my comments above, though I prefer this version to the other one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better colors. --Mile (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support this one is also looks good to me.--Biplab Anand (Talk) 12:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:55, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Windows

The chosen alternative is: File:Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7925.jpg