Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Addax (Addax nasomaculatus).JPG
File:Addax (Addax nasomaculatus).JPG edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2010 at 22:07:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral -- The picture is good, but not quite FP quality. If you posted a version with a wider aspect ratio (not a square) and use of rule-of-thirds, I would support it. However, it does seem better than pictures of similar subjects in Category:Addax nasomaculatus-- LeavXC (talk) 22:29, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice picture, but it is a little noisy due to unnecessary high iso I think. And the cropping isn't perfect. Athyllis (talk) 07:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Could have been sharper, but still great composition.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I like a lot the funny face ;-) Ggia (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Miguel Bugallo 21:37, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- A desert animal with superb camouflage in a meadow ? GerardM (talk) 00:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - per GerardM, just another zoo photo. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Question Is it a bad photo only because it is (or it could be) a zoo photo ? No zoo photo can be good ? No zoo photo can be featured ?--Jebulon (talk) 16:23, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- A photo of this animal in a meadow is not illustrative of the habitat and it is not up to encyclopedic standards. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:33, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- I can agree with this, said by GerardM. But you didn't answer to my question(s) about zoo photos...--Jebulon (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- OpposeI oppose because I agree with the reason above. Thomas888b (talk) 18:57, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- A photo of this animal in a meadow is not illustrative of the habitat and it is not up to encyclopedic standards. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:33, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Question Is it a bad photo only because it is (or it could be) a zoo photo ? No zoo photo can be good ? No zoo photo can be featured ?--Jebulon (talk) 16:23, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support not the best angle. --IdLoveOne (talk) 02:38, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose For a zoo photo I find the defensive posture and closed eye less than ideal. The intensive green of the background is also distracting. --Elekhh (talk) 19:06, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose A bit too noisy in my view. --High Contrast (talk) 20:13, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination