Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Airplane approaching to Palma de Mallorca airport.jpg

File:Airplane approaching to Palma de Mallorca airport.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Feb 2014 at 21:15:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Airplane in landing configuration. A good example of single slotted Fowler flaps. all by Urmas83 -- Urmas Haljaste (talk) 21:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Urmas Haljaste (talk) 21:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~Light not coming from front - must oppose.~~ No seriously, liked it when I reviewed it for QI and think the silhouette look also works for FP --DXR (talk) 21:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Can't understand this picture :( --Kikos (talk) 09:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop-composition. --Mile (talk) 12:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of my favorites. --Rutake (talk) 10:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The offset positioning (cropping) is distracting. --DAJF (talk) 02:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose What airline is it??! No wow. Agree with Kikos. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 15:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Understanding a photo can be puzzling sometimes. I take it as a compliment. I don't want to reveal the airline because it is not important here. I think this photo could be valuable the demonstrate what slotted trailing edge flaps are. And their location. Flaps are inboard but they often confused with ailerons that are located outboard of the trailing edge. Just recently skimmed a British English monolingual dictionary, found a picture of an airplane with the parts named. Ailerons were mistakenly named flaps. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 16:49, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean about the "airline" sentence is the angle. As for the rest of your text, I need some time to digest it. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 17:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The rest of the text was not for you. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 20:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'd prefer a centered composition with this image. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For me the centered composition is out of question here. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 22:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Qwertz1894 (talk) 18:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 05:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The clouds and the craft lack any detail as if NR was overdone. Saffron Blaze (talk) 06:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
what is overdone? Oh, you mean noise reduction. It is applied selectively to sky. Clouds are background here and out of focus anyway. I'm looking at the camera raw just now and I wouldn't say anything is lost. Didn't expect much from you. ----Urmas Haljaste (talk) 09:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I do not like this lighting of object. --Karelj (talk) 17:53, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Can’t see anything special in this pic, just an unidentifyable aeroplane in very harsh contrast, and the off-centered composition does not work for me since all the "weight" is in the left half of the image. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 16:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]