Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:All Saints church, Preston Bagot - Mary and Martha stained glass windows 2016.jpg

File:All Saints church, Preston Bagot - Mary and Martha stained glass windows 2016.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2016 at 19:46:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Stained_glass
Info Stained glass windows of Mary and Martha by Edward Burne-Jones in All Saints church, Preston Bagot, England. Created by DeFacto, uploaded by DeFacto and nominated by DeFacto -- DeFacto (talk). 19:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DeFacto (talk). 19:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 21:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --cart-Talk 21:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mild Oppose - This is surely a nice picture. But does it really belong in the category of Featured Pictures of stained glass windows? If you dare, now look through the category of Quality Images of stained glass windows. Is this among the greatest of those? I'm unconvinced. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I like it because of it's mild, calm, earthy colors, plus the fact that you can actually see something through it (something that is very rare among the pics in the FP and QI sections mentioned above) and what is outside harmonize in colors with the glass paintings themselves. You don't need to go overboard in Technicolor to get an FP of stained glass windows. Here the emphasis is more on "window" than "stained". --cart-Talk 17:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Thanks for your cogently expressed point of view. I might feel the same way if the view through the window were more focused. I'm not saying it's DeFacto's fault that it's not, but I think there's a very high bar for FP stained glass pictures. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ikan --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. -- Colin (talk) 10:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 21:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]