Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altar llamado el Transparente cropped.png

File:Altar llamado el Transparente cropped.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2022 at 11:46:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Interiors
Info - uploaded by A. C. Santacruz - nominated by A. C. Santacruz -- A. C. Santacruz (talk) 11:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- High quality engraving of en:El Transparente. A. C. Santacruz (talk) 11:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice engraving, but this is very small for any kind of FP in 2022. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's over 3.5m pixels, which I judged as safely over the 2m expected minimum, Ikan Kekek. A. C. Santacruz (talk) 12:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question Have you looked at the size of most reproductions that get featured nowadays? The fact that a photo is above the bare minimum necessary to be featured in unusual circumstances doesn't go very far toward guaranteeing its acceptance as one of the very best works in its category on this site. That argument would have a much greater chance of success at com:qic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The borders and captions are inherent to this kind of artwork, and the resolution... We do feaure things near the minimal pixels, but their original size is usually around 3"×4" (about 7cm×10cm) so everything's sharp. There's clearly lost detail here. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:33, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Have taken the liberty to change the gallery link. Gallery pages like Interiors/Religious buildings are used only for photographs; for reproductions of paintings, drawings etc. we have the Non-photographic media/Others etc. gallery pages. Your friendly gallery link service ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 15:08, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Adam. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Adam, very interesting engraving but although it technically meets the minimum resolution, the kind of material in this category that passes is usually much higher res nowadays Cmao20 (talk) 22:45, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]