Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altja jõgi Lahemaal.jpg
File:Altja jõgi Lahemaal.jpg, featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2014 at 21:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created and uploaded by Margus6 - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 21:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 21:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support Nice. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:39, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment an english description and coordonates would be welcome. -- ChristianFerrer 12:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- Done Even thou the coordinates may be up too one hundred meetres off, as photographer isn't very sure on what was the exact spot. Kruusamägi (talk) 21:26, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- ChristianFerrer 06:22, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 07:48, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Like a painting. Beautiful work! --Steindy (talk) 18:12, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support long exposures of flowing water have lately seen a bit of overuse imo, but in this case it works very well for me. --El Grafo (talk) 13:04, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Long exposures of flowing water have lately seen a bit of overuse imo. It does not work here for me, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 22:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support--Ranjith -- (Ranjithsiji) (talk to me) 11:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support. Long exposures of flowing water have lately seen a bit of overuse, but I still think it's the most aesthetic way of demonstrating the flow. I think the movement is important. It's suggestive of flow in a way that short exposures can't provide. Diliff (talk) 18:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Diliff: The Problem with this is imho, that if you overdo it the "flow" may get lost and turn into something that looks more like mist/haze than liquid water. This can of course have its own artistic merits, but Art is not our primary concern at FP … No problem with this image though, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 10:48, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- I agree, if the exposure is too long, it becomes a haze. But as with all legitimate photographic techniques, particularly HDR, it can be used for good and for evil. The key is to know how to use the effect without overdoing it. Diliff (talk) 13:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Diliff: The Problem with this is imho, that if you overdo it the "flow" may get lost and turn into something that looks more like mist/haze than liquid water. This can of course have its own artistic merits, but Art is not our primary concern at FP … No problem with this image though, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 10:48, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- ChristianFerrer 11:54, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural