Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Annapolis MD Acton Cove.JPG

File:Annapolis MD Acton Cove.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2016 at 10:42:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Panoramic view of one of the many marinas in Annapolis, Maryland. To the right is St. Mary's Church and School. All by myself, --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:42, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:42, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks like a very basic tourist shot. Small objects, sky takes about 60% of the picture. Nothing which reminds FP for me here. -- Pofka (talk) 11:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hmm, ok. What I like about the picture is the dominance of blue sky and water with the small green stripe of land inbetween - and the (complimentary) red building complex. There's basically just three dominant colors, four if you count the spotlike white clouds, yachts, and buoys. So the image is rather reduced and, due to its panoramic layout, also wide and opened up. But maybe it just doesn't work... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'm not sure about this one. My first reaction was to like its restful quality, which reminds me of Johann's photos of Pörtschach, but the cutoff of the trees on the right, where they're at full height and density, is bugging me because it feels like it cuts off the movement of my eyes around the picture frame. I'm wondering what this photo would look like if you had just the amount of tree necessary to show the buildings, even while cutting off part of the graveyard. I'm not positive I'd like that better, but I might. I might or might not support this photo, anyway, but right now, I'm undecided; although I like it, I may like it as a QI rather than a FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Pofka. Even so, that might not have been issue but for the clipping in places—the shadow of the trees, for one, and the window trim on tbe other end. Perhaps a little overzealous in the processing? Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice compositionally, maybe a little bit soft in the corners. --Code (talk) 06:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support after rethinking three times. --Hubertl 23:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per Pofka. QI, but nothing special enough to be FP. Yann (talk) 10:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]