Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bedkhem Church, Isfahan, Iran.jpg

File:Bedkhem Church, Isfahan, Iran.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2021 at 08:37:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 08:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 08:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I Participated in the WLM with more than 10 pictures like this image. but I wonder why some weak pictures like this picture should selected as 4th picture and all of my pictures expect one of them should removed. the 4th picture in Iran WLM has been nominated for deletion and you can see the technical problems and weakness. I mailed to WLM organizer. I want to rejudging with fare and justice. These kinds of behaviors and judgments just Reduces WLM and wikipedia credit and can Discourage participant for sharing their images.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 08:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Amir Pashaei, this candidate talk page probably isn't the best place to complain about WLM, but I think many FP regulars agree with you in puzzlement at the choices that the finalist judges often make. Also I believe some national WLMs try to ensure prizes are distributed among several winners rather than one person winning several, though others do not do that at all. Someone on a photo forum once said something like "If you win a photographic competition, the judges are wise and have an excellent eye for a great picture, but if you lose then the judges are ignorant fools who clearly need their eyes tested". It is a bit random really, and always has been. -- Colin (talk) 21:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess the same applies for the promotion process here ;) - Benh (talk) 08:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - The photographer of 4th place of Iran WLM is unknown and copied of another site!!!!! in the page of Iran WLM Diego Delso Has been introduced as one of the judges and Simultaneous he has participated at Portugal and Germany WLM. How can this possible? This is against the law of WLM.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 08:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - Unfortunately some contributors use other people's photos illegally, and even FPC has had a problem with that in the past. If a photo is illegal then it will get deleted and perhaps the prize will be rearranged. Many Commons FP photographers have helped with parts of the judging of WLM in countries where they have not participated. There are 230,000 images uploaded to WLM 2020, so they need volunteers to help. -- Colin (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      - The name of the photographer of 4th picture is a site and this is very easy to find for everyone. the 7th picture of Iran WLM was taken from Laft village and this village not in Iran's monuments list. .The 9th picture of Iran WLM is just a Geological phenomenon and obviously not a historical monument made by human. The 10th picture of Iran WLM is just taken from a normal wooden bridge and this bridge is not in the Iran's monuments list too. 4 picture from 10, featured wrongly. how can this possible????!!!!!--Amir Pashaei (talk) 07:19, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        These are issues to take up with WLM Iran or at Commons talk:Wiki Loves Monuments. -- Colin (talk) 11:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, speaking for everyone on this side of the Atlantic between Canada and Mexico, we just got done with a couple of months of this sort of thing ... Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Hi all. I'm one of the organizers of WLM Iran. I have asked Amirpashaei to operate based on the assumption of good faith and I and other organizers of WLM-IR have been in contact with them answering their questions. I would like to ask Amirpashaei to continue conversations on the threads that are already open with us, instead of going around with an implicit accusatory tone towards certain choices by our jury. I am happy to engage so long as the conversations stay civil and respectful towards everyone who stepped up in a particularly difficult year 2020 was to make WLM-IR happen. --LilyOfTheWest (talk) 06:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 19:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks a bit tilted, but gorgeous as usual. - Benh (talk) 08:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Benh. a perspective correction would ruin it, so I'm ok with it as-is. Cmao20 (talk) 11:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support As per Cmao20 --SM:!) (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran