Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bernache.jpg

File:Bernache.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2012 at 19:03:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Ludo29 - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Question The camera is capable of a larger frame. Is it a cropped image or was the camera set to lower frame size? Also, I know how fast that type of bird can move, so I would like to comment in advance that although there is motion blur on the wing tip at 1/1600 sec. even at 1/4000 or better, either the blur would still be there, or the light would be too low for an image as fine as this one.--Canoe1967 (talk) 05:36, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- About your first question, I can't know, I'm not the photographer. Anyways, the differences are low. Tomer T (talk) 08:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'd say it's a crop not a downsizing.--PierreSelim (talk) 09:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hello,
  - I'm the photographer. Thanks Tomer T for the proposal. It's nice to see that my photos are appreciated.
  - It's cropped a little bit, and I resized the photograph. The sensor has 24 Mega pixels (4 032 × 6 048 resolution). This photograph is merely a squared format : 3 056 × 3 056 pixels. I wanted to have the subject in the center of the picture, hence I did that. Do you want me to upload the original ? Ludo (talk) 10:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - I think you are confusing which camera you used. The EXIF says this was an A550 which is only 14MP and corresponds exactly with a square crop of the 3:2 original. Colin (talk) 11:11, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - You're right. I've an Alpha 900 and an Alpha 550. I'm confusing for this photograph. So. I don't crop the photo, only resize. The sensor of the 550 has 15 Mega pixels (4 592 × 3 056 resolution). Ludo (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 09:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colin (talk) 11:11, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 13:07, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Is it customary to upload the original as well, in case others wish to edit the image from full size?--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 10:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:23, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good. -- Raghith 06:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose blown forehead, a bit noisy, centered composition, bad and too wide crop at top. The original is much better. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tamba52 (talk) 05:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As kaʁstn--Miguel Bugallo 17:27, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Original edit

Ludo (talk) 19:57, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 04:21, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

The chosen alternative is: File:Bernache.jpg