Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Biandintz eta zaldiak - modified2.jpg

Image:Biandintz eta zaldiak.jpg, not featured edit

Info created by Mikel Ortega from Errenteria, Spain - uploaded by the BOT of User:Magnus Manske and nominated by Tarawneh
Support --Tarawneh 01:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like too much denoised or something like that when viewed at full size, nonetheless it's a beautiful photo with quite acceptable quality, plus it's my land. - Keta 09:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very noisy and lack of contrast. inisheer 09:57, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful. Try downsampling a bit to reduce noise. --norro 10:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose almost... The composition with one horse covering the other prevents it IMO from being an FP. Lycaon 10:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support The one horse in the back doesn't disturb me, as long the other is captured perfectly. --Niabot 10:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fantastic picture ! Noise is 2 much --Richard Bartz 12:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice picture. But I agree with Lycaon and Richard --Simonizer 14:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Noisy --Laitche 10:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Million Moments 11:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Don't get a clear image of any of the horses. See the back of one foal, the other is nearly completely covered. The adult shows basically the side in the shadow and left leg is hidden. Not a bad picture but also not impressive enough to be featured. Andreas Tille 07:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Mywood 11:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modified Version, not featured edit

Info created by Niabot - uploaded by Niabot --Niabot 15:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Info new overworked version: noise removed, remaining shadow of the missing horse removed, small color corrections. --Niabot 10:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --norro 23:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Mywood 11:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More modified version, featured edit

Info created & uploaded by --Richard Bartz 17:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Info There was tons of noise which now looks ok. The disturbing horse in the back was retouched more gently --Richard Bartz 17:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Richard Bartz 17:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Info It seams, that you missed to remove some parts around the legs. --Niabot 17:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed --Richard Bartz 17:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some more things:

between the two horses is still one part of the removed horse
the shadow of the removed horse is stil present ::--Niabot 13:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The slave who give it one's all, althought it's not his own picture says: "Fixed" --Richard Bartz 14:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Acarpentier 17:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition, good depth of field and great sharpness. Freedom to share 18:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Thermos 20:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's some amazing clone work, but you've missed some bits along the tail (right side and in between strands in the middle). --Dori - Talk 21:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed --Richard Bartz 00:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Support --Dori - Talk 16:03, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition is nice ^_^ - Noumenon _talk 21:18, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, beautiful. --Aqwis 21:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the way the low dark clouds in the horizon seem to be rising up to kiss the horses rearend.... -- carol 22:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The fix for the sky is nice -- I was working on it because it seemed interesting. The downsampling because of the noise in the shady part of the horse is kinda sad. The bell confuses me -- is this a usual thing for horses in Europe? -- carol 04:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, will this be the first image uploaded by a bot from Flickr that is accepted to CFP? -- carol 15:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I liked the original but the quality was too low, glad Richard fixed this. Calibas 01:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Durova 06:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice picture, good composition. Sémhur 07:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like either this or Niabot's version. - Keta 09:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the original image size. This is 2 much make the image size small. -- Laitche 10:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its enough to make a a photoprint ..Richard Bartz 11:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ha ha ha, okay, then I didn't oppose :) -- Laitche 12:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

do you prefer size or noise ? --Richard Bartz 15:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm... Both! :) -- Laitche 19:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Into every life a little rain must fall. --Richard Bartz 20:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My life is every day fine. ＼（＾＾）／ -- Laitche 16:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support It sure is nice to see a picture with a title in Basque :-) 11:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC) —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Vmenkov (talk • contribs)
Support featurable. Lycaon 13:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support much better --Simonizer 16:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose nice picture, but the typical points of the breed can not be seen, so it is valueless for an enzyclopedia. --87.78.158.47 21:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Two things. First of all, it is not just encyclopedic value that matters and also anonymous voting is not allowed. Create an account and/or log in to vote. Freedom to share 22:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice work done by Richard. -- MJJR 21:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --norro 23:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! Jacopo 17:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support RedCoat 19:17, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Who has never taken photos of the animals, don't know how is difficult to made similar picture. --Martin Kozák 22:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are perfectly right that fitting the criteria of featured pictures is very hard. But this is no excuse. We evaluate the final result and not the effort the photographer has done. I like the picture and I think the photographer can be proud about it - but I do not regard it featured anyway. Andreas Tille 07:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, You are right. It has been a note only, not reason for my vote. Reason for my vote are nice composition and image (not technical) purity. Sure, it brings high level of artefacts by noise correction so details are supressed. It is a pity. --Martin Kozák 23:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Did you brightened the left side of the standing horse ? or was just the lighting so nice (or use of mirror ?) ! Benh 20:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Don't get a clear image of any of both horses. See the back of the foal and adult shows basically the side in the shadow and left leg is hidden. Better than before but also not yet impressive enough to be featured. Andreas Tille 07:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support As per supports above Booksworm 09:24, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Mywood 11:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simple modified version edit

Info edited & uploaded by -- Laitche 19:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche 19:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks. -- Laitche 17:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only noise reduction version edit

Info This one is not for voting. Please do not vote. -- Laitche 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Editing miss. （＾＾； -- Laitche 19:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]