Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bovington modified type 59 2014.JPG

File:Bovington modified type 59 2014.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Feb 2021 at 15:28:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Military_vehicles
Info created by Geni - uploaded by Geni - nominated by Geni -- Geni (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support My argument for tanks look better in motion-- Geni (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In my opinion, FP should have a proper, insightful and substantive image description. Furthermore, it is useful to indicate the coordinates. --Mosbatho (talk) 18:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Coordinates added. Not sure what you want from the caption. It says what it is and what collection its part of).Geni (talk) 19:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Punctuation marks, capitalization at the beginning of the sentence, information about which event the picture was taken at. --Mosbatho (talk) 19:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation added. It wasn't really taken an an event. The tank museum has a "pay money ride in a tank" thing that just happened to be going on while I was there.Geni (talk) 01:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mosbatho (talk) 08:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not feeling blown away, for some reason, but I think it's a deserving candidate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I like it, and the "motion" does make it more interesting. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral the image isn't bad at all and I'd support if it weren't for the faces. The two staff members/visitors seem to be enjoying this ride a tad too visibly. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 07:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like kids with water guns 🔫 at this Tank Museum :-) Basile Morin (talk) 10:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tourist snap. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles --Co mmon ists 17:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 15:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Charles. --Cayambe (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question It's a tourist snap. So what, if it's high quality and well composed? Canaletto and Guardi sold cityscapes of Venice to tourists. Did that make them bad art? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For sure, this is not a tourist vehicle -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, it sure isn't. hahaha -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 07:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support More than a tourist snap for me because of the composition and dramatic atmosphere Cmao20 (talk) 01:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles. —kallerna (talk) 12:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So what exactly do you mean by tourist snap?Geni (talk) 16:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I'm sure these guys were tankful for the opportunity, but while I don't blame the photographer for trying, even the dust clouds do not make this picture less static. Daniel Case (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question What do you mean by static? The tank clearly moved, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Charles. -- Karelj (talk) 16:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So what do you mean by tourist snap?Geni (talk) 20:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]