Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caroline sada landscape.jpg

File:Caroline sada landscape.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2015 at 20:59:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Caroline Sada - uploaded by Tuvalkin - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 20:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 20:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support (not sure if uploader can vote, though…) -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Beautiful colors. Weak for the low resolution despite being a technically unchallenging shot. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 08:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support very good composition,but not the quality --LivioAndronico talk 09:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice photo but I assume it's too much downscaling. --Laitche (talk) 09:37, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but quite small. Yann (talk) 11:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The colours could be brighter. --Tremonist (talk) 14:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 14:30, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --I almost voted for it: nice colors and mood with the white flowers, the denoise and downsampling saved the image from the use of ISO 800 (at 1/500 for a landscape!), but the plastic-like clouds well at the center, result from the denoising, ruins everything. A pity. Sting (talk) 23:31, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose An FP scene, but not captured at FP quality in my opinion (as described in detail by others). — Julian H.^✈ 16:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Agree with the opposes but still see reasons to promote it. Poc o² 18:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not enough quality for a so downscaling image. -- Christian Ferrer 18:48, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 3 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 12:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]