Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chrysanthemum Stone1.jpg

File:Chrysanthemum Stone1.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2009 at 17:50:47

•  Info created by Two+two=4 - uploaded by Two+two=4 - nominated by Two+two=4 -- Two+two=4 (talk) 17:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Two+two=4 (talk) 17:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Wow, 270 millions years old, thats amazing. It even appears to have a water droplet on one of the percieved petals. I have never seen anything like this before, its very intriguing and makes me thirsty for more information. Julielangford (talk) 10:51, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Question It feels very dark, especially around the edges of the white, but I am not sure exactly what I am looking at. Is the white part embedded in something darker or does it lie on top of something black ? /Daniel78 (talk) 20:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Both the black and the white parts belong to the same stone. The matrix (the black part)is limestone. The crystals (the white part) are andalucite so two different minerals in the same stone. Everything is natural.--Two+two=4 (talk) 21:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose noisy and unsharp. Sorry but for me: boring. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:51, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC)