Info created by Butterfly voyages - uploaded by Butterfly voyages - nominated by Butterfly voyages --Butterfly voyages (talk ) 01:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Butterfly voyages (talk ) 01:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose A little bit to low DoF, which makes none of the presented individuals clearly visible. + not sufficient species descriptions, but that can be easily fixed. Masur (talk ) 03:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Good --ka ʁs tn 09:36, 1 July 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose as Masur. Lycaon (talk ) 09:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose As others opponents. --Karel (talk ) 20:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Very interesting picture but imperfect execution. DOF, crop, lighting (some eroded parts) • Richard • [®] • 21:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Mae din \talk 20:16, 10 July 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]