Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Common Blackbird (Turdus merula) feeding.jpg

File:Common Blackbird (Turdus merula) feeding.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2015 at 13:33:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Turdidae (Thrushes)
Info Common Blackbird (Turdus merula male) before swallowing his food. All by --Mile (talk) 13:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 13:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 14:06, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:45, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cluttered, distracting background, and color seems off a little bit. Daniel Case (talk) 19:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but distracting background and over-processed? --Laitche (talk) 22:29, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info I rarely (over)process my photos, moreover, I mainly shot in jpeg. Only processing of this one is brightness to -6, contrast to +3 and crop (both out of 100). I wouldn't say that's some serious processing, which was done in Olympuis Viewer. So let know where or what is problem (overprocessed). --Mile (talk) 06:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- If you don't use raw file, I think the camera is automatically processing the photo (jpeg). I'm setting my camera RAW+JPG, so sometimes JPG has been over-processed (oversharpened, too much NR, etc). For instance, the exif says "Sharpness:Normal" , I think that Normal doesn't mean nothing, that means sharpen filter applied, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 13:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No sharpening was applied nor camera is known for it. Its very wrong to talk someone what setting to use having complete other camera brand, with different specifications, codecs etc etc. So, your statement about over-processing is wrong, doing mistake is human they say, but don't insist in it. --Mile (talk) 17:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Mmm you say so, sharpening was not applied to this and no denoising in Olympuis's jpeg. --Laitche (talk) 19:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Lovely bird! --Tremonist (talk) 12:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Soundwaweserb (talk) 15:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree with the comments about the cluttered background. Furthermore the angle is not favourable, too high and the resolution is not the best, either. Sorry, I am not convinced in spite of the nice moment. Poc o² 17:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry but I also agree with the comments about the cluttered background. Not one of our finest bird images, nicely captured moment but not enough WOW.--ArildV (talk) 07:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Mile (talk) 19:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]