Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coprinopsis lagopus-20220513-RM-100643.jpg

File:Coprinopsis lagopus-20220513-RM-100643.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2022 at 21:29:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Psathyrellaceae
Info Close-up of a Coprinopsis lagopus (harefoot mushroom), height approx. 3 cm . All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, one of the best mushroom photos I've seen on this site. Please add size info in your file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 07:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the bokeh and the management of the light. This long stem is amazing, but the bottom is distracting in my view. It's so small, like a bad crop. Why not cutting it out? The length effect would be amplified, and the composition improved In my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Info I left the floor extra so that you can see the length approximately. The fungus is very small. If I cut off the floor you might think the stem is much longer.--Ermell (talk) 12:38, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I support you on this, for whatever that's worth, though I agre with Charles that a bit more soil might be better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I prefer the other one -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It should probably be cropped to not show that bit of dirt on the bottom. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 13:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It could be cropped more or less, both would be better than just of bit of soil. More might be better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support though I'd like to see a (small) bit more of the bottom. --Cayambe (talk) 18:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The dirt at the bottom gives context. --Tagooty (talk) 08:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped version edit

Info @Urban Versis 32: @Charlesjsharp: @Basile Morin: @Ikan Kekek: @Aristeas: @Cayambe: Unfortunately, there is no more soil available. Please have a look at the cropped version.--Ermell (talk) 20:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like it better - No soil is better than a tiny bit of soil, which would seem a little out of place to me. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 20:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Me too. Either no soil or more than a tiny bit. --Lupe (talk) 23:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support This version is obviously more beautiful, the first one more educative, I’m fine with each of them. --Aristeas (talk) 05:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support For aesthetic reasons, I prefer the alternative version. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:28, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support This version has something artistic in its appearance -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 11:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:59, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would have supported this version if it had been the only one that was nominated, but I prefer the other version and therefore don't feel inclined to vote on this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:14, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree, the crop is better here Poco a poco (talk) 17:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can't help but think that the bit of dirt shows the height, while the crop doesn't give an idea of the real height. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think the height is too much of a problem with bokeh this good. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I support the other version. --Tagooty (talk) 14:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 11:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Psathyrellaceae

The chosen alternative is: File:Coprinopsis lagopus-2-20220513-RM-100643.jpg