Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crâne de smilodon exposé au Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo.jpg

File:Crâne de smilodon exposé au Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2016 at 23:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
Info Crânio de um smilodon populator Lund, 1842, no Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo. O famoso "Tigre-de-Dentes-de-Sabre" sul-americano tem ampla ocorrência no Pleistoceno (aprox. 10.000 anos) do Brasil. Seu primeiro registro no Estado de São Paulo (município de Apiaí) trata-se de esqueleto coletado por equipe do Museu de Zoologia (USP), e descrito por Mariela Castro e Max Langer. All by -- The Photographer (talk) 23:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Photographer (talk) 23:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Larger resolution, please. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Caraca, você esta muito viciado com commons, kkk --The Photographer (talk) 00:48, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado! Só tô dando uma olhadinha antes de dormir. Boa noite.

😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mild Oppose - I wish the bones were more in light and less in shadow, but that effect is amplified by the very light area on the left side of the picture. If you tightly crop all that bright empty space, I will reconsider and might support a feature (though no guarantees). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:47, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Thanks for your comment, however, without the negative space on the left, this photo would have much less sense. Negative space is the area between and around objects in a photo. Use it to see shapes and sizes more effectively, and produce better composed images. I invite you to read Understanding And Using "Negative Space" In Photography and Using the Rule of Space in Your Composition --The Photographer (talk) 11:36, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the links, but my opinion as a viewer is that this particular negative space detracts from the subject. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:31, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Photographer read 6 and 7, ;), and the the most bright point in the picture will be the first point that our eyes goes, in this case, at the negative space. Image same shot, but the light between the teeth, and and a more clear eye, centred, occupying more of the canvas... -- RTA 20:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 21:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp and noisy on too much of the skull. Daniel Case (talk) 04:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support A larger DOF would have been nice but I like everything else about this enough to support -- Thennicke (talk) 23:29, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking. ~★ nmaia ^{[[mia diskuto]]} 03:20, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]