Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Börnste, Felder und Bäume -- 2017 -- 3167.jpg

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Börnste, Felder und Bäume -- 2017 -- 3167.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 05:38:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • @Karelj: Sorry, I can't accept the reason of your vote. It is not necessary to have any benefit for Wikipedia. Here is Wikimedia Commons, a media archive for everybody. And the benefit for Wikipedia is not part of the guidelines of a FPC. --XRay talk 05:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Karelj: Please have a look to Commons:Project scope: It acts as a common repository for all Wikimedia projects, but the content can be used by anyone, anywhere, for any purpose. And please have a look to Commons:Image guidelines too. Please add a reason for your oppose. It would help me and other photographers to understand why this photograph isn't FP in your opinion. Thank you. --XRay talk 06:18, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @XRay: Sorry for using not correct reason for oppose. But my feeling about this image is still the same - such photo is not enouht quality for FP. Technically pefrect. But I do not understand the reason for this nominatiom. I know, that you have a lot of FP on Wiki (some of them are also problematic from my point of view), but why this one...?? Three tree trunks cutted in let say 1.5 m height and nothint else? Maybe there is some small beetle, which is centre of picture and I do not see it (my weak glasses???)... I am sorry, but for sure I have no strong estetic sense, or how to call it, and only things which I feel looking on picture are: Have I enough wood for heating in my weekend house for this winter? and Is my chainsaw well adjusted for next work? So - no wow at all. --Karelj (talk) 18:03, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]