Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dünnschaliger Kartoffelbovist-Scleroderma verrucosum-20191227-RM-154442.jpg

File:Dünnschaliger Kartoffelbovist-Scleroderma verrucosum-20191227-RM-154442.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2020 at 07:45:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Boletales (Boletes)
Info all by me -- Ermell (talk) 07:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 07:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good! --Ivar (talk) 08:43, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - As I said on QIC, this is a remarkable picture! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:29, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Der deutsche Namensteil sollte auf Braunwarziger Hartbovist geändert werden. --Kreuz schnabel 10:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Quatsch. Er ist das Gegenteil vom Dickschaligen K., also ergibt es einen Sinn. In meinem Bestimmungsbuch steht er auch so drin. Es gibt außerdem noch andere Trivialnamen. Ermell kann ihn benennen wie er will. --Hockei (talk) 11:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Dateinamen auf Commons sollten den Gegenstand exakt bezeichnen, und der jetzige Trivialname wird auch für Scleroderma areolatum verwendet und ist damit nicht eindeutig. Ich kann alternativ auch damit leben, nur den wissenschaftlichen Namen stehen zu lassen. --Kreuz schnabel 12:16, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Dass S. areolatum gelegentlich als Dünnschaliger K. bezeichnet wird, beruht lediglich auf eine Verwechslung mit S. verrucosum. Der Fehler liegt bei der deutschen Wikipedia. Die Bezeichnung Dünnschaliger K. sollte dort daher bei S. areolatum entfernt und auf S. verrucosum verlinkt werden. --Hockei (talk) 16:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support Stunning work and at a really high level even for an FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment very good detail. The stuff on the ground, is it blue-black or is the colour balance wrong or some other reason? -- Colin (talk) 18:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Info The material is bark which probably reflects the sky. This can also be seen in other mushroom photos.--Ermell (talk) 20:25, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:05, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Meiræ 02:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charles (talk) 14:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the quality is good but the background and the centred composition don't want to appeal me. --Hockei (talk) 15:35, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 18:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I agree with Hockei this time. The quality is excellent as on many of your other pictures, but the light, foreground and the background don't appeal to me very much. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:36, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 22:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 17:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Boletales (Boletes)