Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dode geknakte berk (Betula) 21-08-2019. (d.j.b). 09.jpg
File:Dode geknakte berk (Betula) 21-08-2019. (d.j.b). 09.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 15:16:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural # The Netherlands
- Info A summer storm has struck the terminal birch. Birch mushrooms have begun recycling.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support Seven Pandas (talk) 21:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Support Boothsift 05:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Now after a second look, no wow--Boothsift 02:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 08:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is fine, but I miss some wow here, not sure what makes this shot special Poco2 08:27, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Not an excellent picture for me.--Fischer.H (talk) 08:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting picture and good quality as ever but I don't think this is among your best. At first I didn't really know what I was looking at, and an FP for me shouldn't be a picture where you rely on the caption to see what's going on. I agree that it lacks wow compared to your best work. Cmao20 (talk) 16:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Good light but I don't see anything else than messy branches. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Alternative edit
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Good light but I don't see anything else than messy branches. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support IMO way better than the other one. The wider view gives more context so I can understand what I'm looking at. Cmao20 (talk) 23:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Better but still not FP to me. Hightlights seem blown, and the image somehow lacks depth to me. The cut-off branches don’t help. Composition just looks arbitrary. Maybe it should have been taken from the right hand side, with the crack in foreground and the cracked-off tip pointing away from the viewer. --Kreuzschnabel 07:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. You mean like this--Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not wowed by either one ... all I see is a damaged tree. Daniel Case (talk) 05:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:54, 4 September 2019 (UTC)