Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elvillar - Chabola de la Hechicera 01.jpg

File:Elvillar - Chabola de la Hechicera 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2017 at 21:25:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info All by me. -- Basotxerri (talk) 21:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basotxerri (talk) 21:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I love this. Did you put the top rock there yourself ;-) PumpkinSky talk 21:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I did, it's my home . --Basotxerri (talk) 17:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent. I love the contrasts. :)--Peulle (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:49, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support impressive (though maybe oversharpened) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --cart-Talk 09:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ehm...signos of (bad) editing are clearly visible near the stones....Paolobon140 (talk) 14:02, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Martin Falbisoner and Paolobon140: If you leave me a note on the image where you see the problems, I could try to get it better. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:58, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

see examples --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:28, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question - No vote from me, but could you please add some information in the file description about how big these rocks are, because we have no way to know that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What you see has got a height of about 1,5–2 metres but there is some access on the other side and a person could stand below. See http://sendaraba.blogspot.com.es/2017/05/salidas-de-senderismo-ruta-prehistorica.html --Basotxerri (talk) 19:41, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please add that to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:01, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Basotxerri (talk) 21:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose not wow for me, just stones -- Jiel (talk) 21:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The rocks are oversharpened. Daniel Case (talk) 22:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Better now. Daniel Case (talk) 23:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Martin Falbisoner and Daniel Case: Thanks for the hint! Better now? --Basotxerri (talk) 17:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 05:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 06:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per Daniel, it is definitely (also in the last version) oversharpened, specially in the two openings inside the dolmen. Poc o² 11:10, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Poco a poco and Daniel Case: Done A bit more know...--Basotxerri (talk) 18:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks better now Poc o² 19:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It still doesnt work for me. It look more like a cartoon that a photograph, with dimensions of stones which is not understandable. The picture looks overworked in photoshop and the result is something i find quite fake. Paolobon140 (talk) 10:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:49, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects