Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Entengasse 3 - Homberg Efze 01.jpg

File:Entengasse 3 - Homberg Efze 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2022 at 07:34:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like this, great motif and colours Cmao20 (talk) 22:16, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Kind of busy for me, though. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support very eye catching. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Photographically just a QI. The subject is interesting, but this is a small crop of an interesting building (File:Entengasse 3 Homberg (Efze) 20200831 004.jpg and File:Entengasse 3 Homberg (Efze) 20200831 021.jpg). -- Colin (talk) 11:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yes, a crop of one of the most notable details of this building --Llez (talk) 15:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Highlighting just one aspect of a building is legitimate. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful detail capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed a very interesting building, but this detail – a portal with ears ;–) – is especially notable and captured well. --Aristeas (talk) 08:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --GRDN711 (talk) 00:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. -- Karelj (talk) 16:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. The crop is not interesting IMO--Lmbuga (talk) 21:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The crop shows an interesting detail. --Milseburg (talk) 15:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Quality is ok, lighting ordinary leaving than the question whether the subject can be considered extraordinary. To me it isn't but on the other side it is original enough not to oppose, so I keep neutral. For this kind of shots it would be important IMHO (and a success criteria for the nom), if you provide some additional information about the subject (history, propertiees,...), as you required in the noms of others. Poco a poco (talk) 16:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany