Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fábio Maldonado 2022.jpg

File:Fábio Maldonado 2022.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2022 at 21:42:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
Info The athlete was aware that he was being photographed for Wikipedia) / created by JukoFF - uploaded by JukoFF - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support SVeach94 (talk) 02:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality, sorry. While it’s funny you cannot unsee it’s a phonecam shot, with its heavy noise reduction and loss of detail. Nothing is really sharp, the face is in focus but motion-blurred. --Kreuz schnabel 07:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But probably theoretically, in good light, a photo from a phone can be a "Featured picture", don't you think? JukoFF (talk) 11:30, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure that’s possible, yet I think this one isn’t. --Kreuz schnabel 13:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Heterogeneous background at the upper right corner. Is it the same guy on the t-shirt? Category:Recursion could be used, and the description mention it (see self-reference on Wikipedia). -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:53, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category added. Thanks for the tip! JukoFF (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per others above. Yann (talk) 14:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 14:40, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 17:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment On a positive note, the phone camera does have one thing speaking for it. The wide angle lens exaggerates the size of the close fist in relation to the further away head. Normally you wouldn't want that in a portrait, but it makes a lot of sense here. --El Grafo (talk) 07:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think this isn't that far from being an FP and is worth nominating at QIC. Good portrait, but not quite sharp and detailed enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gildir (talk) 08:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]