Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fiore di albicocco, leggermente rovinato dalla brinata.jpg

File:Fiore di albicocco, leggermente rovinato dalla brinata.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2022 at 16:52:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by [[User:{{subst:PROPOLI87}}|]] -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 16:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 16:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Apricot blossom, slightly marred by frost. Unfortunately, with the change in the climate on earth, early flowering of fruit trees occurs, which is then caught by the frost due to the cold and then compromising the fruits.

I photographed because I find it beautiful in its imperfection, as it also happens to people — Preceding unsigned comment added by PROPOLI87 (talk • contribs)

Oppose Right, but what do you think makes this not-very-sharp, noisy photo with distracting background one of the very best photos on the site? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC) *

Commentthe flowers in the photo have blossomed on the trunk, so the trunk is the background. A strong wind is blowing and it was impossible to photograph other flowers of the same tree on the branches, with a sky background, which would have been better User:PROPOLI87[reply]

Comment First, that you weren't able to do better is not an explanation of how this is one of the best photos on the site. Second, part of the background that's distracting is the strong light on the right and left, though all the yellow flowers (?) are also distracting. Third, it's very hard to get photos of sufficient quality (sharpness, lack of noise) to pass at featured picture candidates with a cellphone. It's been done, but this is not an example of it. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)* CommentOK, sorry, I didn't understand. Yellow are not flowers, but are lichens grown on the trunk. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 13:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 13:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC) :* CommentAnd anyway I justified the fact that it was blowing wind because I wanted to propose an imperfect flower, but now any other photo of this flower has become unrepeatable. Among other things, the wind has already blown away all the petals. I apologize again. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 10:25, 21 March 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 10:25, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 21:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Gallery link fixed. Your friendly gallery link service ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
-thank you (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 17:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan and the light conditions were not favorable. --Ivar (talk) 13:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I quite like the colours and the light but the image quality is very low for FP, the sharpness is quite poor and to be really honest I wonder how it can have passed QI Cmao20 (talk) 14:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]