Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foļvarkas vecticībnieku baznīca.jpg

File:Foļvarkas vecticībnieku baznīca.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2014 at 18:48:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by alinco_fan - uploaded by Kikos - nominated by Kikos -- Kikos (talk) 18:48, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kikos (talk) 18:48, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 15:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Awesome shot. --glossologist (talk) 09:38, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Photo itself looks great, but that doesn't seem to be a FP lever quality. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:46, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support — C M B J 07:37, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Halavar (talk) 11:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice compo, but the quality is insufficient, I'm sorry --A.Savin 14:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per A.Savin --Christian Ferrer 06:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose its nice but it doesnt have FP wow quality Gnan garra 11:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice and everything, but a daylight photo must have better quality IMO. --DXR (talk) 11:56, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks great in the preview but at full res the concerns over quality are quite apparent. Wonderful setting and very featurable if done right. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:56, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Author of this picture works in "old" photochemical way. This is a scan from paper copy. --Kikos (talk) 17:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Perhaps a better scan would solve all the issues. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:27, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:48, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]