Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foggy morning at Twin Peaks.jpg

File:Foggy morning at Twin Peaks.jpg, featured edit

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2009 at 16:36:41

Info created by Two+two=4 - uploaded by Two+two=4 - nominated by Two+two=4 -- Two+two=4 (talk) 16:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Two+two=4 (talk) 16:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the dreamy feel to this. Great pano work with lovely stitching. I especially love the effect the mist has on the bridge. Julielangford (talk) 18:46, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Even for an early morning picture I think it's still way too dark. A little action with the curves and I might support. --Calibas (talk) 01:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded one.--Two+two=4 (talk) 01:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was not only early morning it was a foggy morning as well. The fog is seen in some places at the image but it was everywhere.--Two+two=4 (talk) 02:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support beautiful.--Luxembourg (talk) 05:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The objects in the foreground appear cut off, contrast is too low, and resolution is bordering on too low as well for a panorama. -- JovanCormac 17:36, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Size is too low, but big wow prevails. --Karel (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Agree with Karelj. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per JovanCormac. —kallerna™ 08:02, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As others opponents. -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 16:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice atmosphere. --Lošmi (talk) 22:15, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\^talk 12:50, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative, not featured edit

Support--Two+two=4 (talk) 04:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 19:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\^talk 12:50, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The voting period for this candidate is over, but the FPCBot is leaving this for manual investigation due to use of multiple images. Closing this candidate needs to be done using the manual instructions.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]