Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frauenstein Nussberg 146 Filialkirche hl Oswald und Bauernhaus WNW-Ansicht 21082017 0491.jpg

File:Frauenstein Nussberg 146 Filialkirche hl Oswald und Bauernhaus WNW-Ansicht 21082017 0491.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2017 at 04:49:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:49, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:49, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question white line between the sky and roofs? --Ivar (talk) 05:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Iifar: Those annoying white lines were largely reduced. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:58, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

* I withdraw my nomination The motive is not attractive enough. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Johann Jaritz: Why did you withdraw it? The composition, clouds, and colors are amazing. The crop on the right could be better (to avoid cutting the tree halfway), but this is all-around a great photo. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:49, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I withdrew because of the hidden belltower and there was no reaction by anyone. So I assumed that it wouldn`t be enough for a FPC. But I`m gonna give it a second chance as a consequence of your encouragement. Perhaps there is a tiny chance for this image. The crop on the right side I will try to solve it in a better way. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done The image was "reanimated" and the halfway cut tree on the right side cropped out. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:29, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ I find the halos (thin and bright around the left-hand and roof of the house and the right side of the church and the tree to its right, and a little more diffuse around the left roof's various protrusions) to be unpleasant. Possibly caused by very slight misalignment or movement during HDR generation? Other than that, I think the composition and colors are very nice, but the halos are unfortunately dealbreakers for me. Storkk (talk) 15:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Storkk: The only way to get rid of those annoying halos was to reduce the blue tone of the sky to the original value. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:48, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Much better, IMO. Thanks, Storkk (talk) 08:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for my part. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:26, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:17, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've been waiting for the softer tone of the sky ;-)--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:19, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Wolfgang. You taught me an important item. :=O -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Albertus teolog (talk) 21:44, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support This version is much better. Glad you stayed in at FPC. PumpkinSky talk 23:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course the motive is attractive enough, and the light, the composition, the sharpness, the overall quality too !--Jebulon (talk) 21:27, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 11:37, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings